Skip to main content

Goodnight Mommy (2014)

Goodnight Mommy is a Swedish horror/thriller that was originally released in 2014.  The movie follows two young twins as they spend their summer in the remote Swedish countryside.  They’re seen early on celebrating a summer full of innocent fun with laughter, sunshine and smiles.  One day, their mother returns home having gone through cosmetic surgery on her face.  Her face is bandaged beyond recognition.  Is she who she really says she is?  After some suspicious activity, the two boys begin to question her identity.  Is she someone that we can trust?  Alternatively, can the perspective from the boys be trusted?

There’s not too much more I can say about the plot, as the story takes you for a few twists and turns as akin to horror movies.   I will say this though, that within 6 minutes of the movie, you could already tell what the major twist of the story will be.  And it’s mostly because it’s nothing that you haven’t already seen before.  However, the twist itself is not the point; even the big reveal at the end is nonchalant and anticlimactic when the curtain is pulled away.  Rather, it’s more about the storytelling, leading you into their lives, getting you to feel for the characters.

And it’s this aspect where the movie achieves its successes.  We, the viewers, are flipflopped the further the story goes.  We’re just not sure who we can trust.  In this way, the movie follows a similar beat to that of Gone Girl, where the viewer bounces between who is the protagonist and antagonist.  Whereas Gone Girl felt like a roller coaster of emotions, Goodnight Mommy feels more like one slow moving descent into an abyss of uncertainty.

For this reason, I think the movie mostly works.  The first two-thirds of the movie hooks you with its atmosphere and its escalating tension and mystery.  The movie is plodding and doesn’t go for the cheap thrills, unlike most modern American horror movies.

However, the movie isn’t without its flaws, and it’s in the third act where it feels like things fall apart.  There’s a scene in the third act where random visitors from the Red Cross appear at the family’s home seeking donations.  You can understand how they used the scene to try and build tension, but their appearance comes so far out of left field that it shifts the tone that they took their time in setting up.  And from there, it sort of falls apart.

The movie ends and doesn’t address every question.  This may seem frustrating to some, but the questions are small, and are minor to the bigger picture.

Recent previews have dubbed it as the “scariest movie ever made”, but I wouldn’t hold those statements to any regard.  It’s probably more creepy than scary, but even if you consider it scary, I’m sure you’ve seen scarier.


As a horror geek, it’s worth checking out, otherwise, it’s nothing that you haven’t already seen.  Later geeks!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have.

In The Science of God, Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible.

The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will.

In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genesis. Duri…

DTV Madness: Jack Brooks - M.S. and Gingerdead Man 2

Okay, honestly, I think this will be the last DTV post for a while. One man can only take so much shit. I'm only human, I have feelings too. These two movies pushed my limit. I'm going to be in DTV-detox for the next month or so.

Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer

I thought that with a title like this, it couldn't fail. I thought that with a poster like they had, it couldn't fail. Then I realized something... I failed. I failed in thinking that this movie had any hope.

I was expecting some fun horror, mixed with comedy in sort of a Buffy the Vampire Slayer kind of fashion with a bumbling hero and smart quips. I mean, with a title like Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer, was I wrong in expecting a variety of monsters get slayed as the title suggests?

It didn't help much that the monsters looked uber cheesy. They looked like something right out of a Power Rangers episode. But to their credit, at least they stuck with practical make-up and effects rather than CG.

The movie its…

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong?

Pacing.

If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game?

Max Payne is based…