Skip to main content

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong?

Pacing.

If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game?

Max Payne is based on the video game of the same name following the titular character as he searches for the killers of his family. The storyline in the movie was basically the same, although there were some obvious deviations (crooked corporations instead of gangs and mobs).

Although Marky-Mark's acting was the palest of comparisons to his performance in The Departed, I can forgive it only because in the game Max Payne, those performances were wooden. Ludacris was just a little more than a set decoration in various scenes. The first time he popped up on screen, the theater erupted in laughter (the same thing happened when my friend saw it last week). He's a fine actor, I think it wouldn't of hurt to give him a bit more screen time. Mila Kunis does her best to play a tough chick, but I just can't buy it. She's the scrawny little girl from that 70's Show, and she's too sweet to play the rugged girl. However, she was fine too.

Hats off to the set decorators, editors, and director of photography. They did quite a superb job of disguising Toronto as New York City. I kept looking for clear Canadian landmarks, but couldn't find any. I think I caught a brief glimpse of the Four Seasons Centre though. Oh yeah, and the obvious Bay Station at the beginning.

So in the end, I guess that's the grand tragedy of it all; the potential was all there, it was just squandered. This could have been great. They left the ending open for a sequel, but I have major doubts to whether they'd act on it. Until next time, later geeks.

Comments

That's a damn shame. I still want to see this though, for two reasons- Veriety, of all magazines, actually gave it a half-decent review, and I quite like Mark Wahlberg as an actor.
The Lam said…
I had the same feeling. I knew that most of the reviews were atrocious, but I still did want to see it. In Toronto, on Tuesdays they have $5 tickets (instead of the regular $10-$12). I'd say that it was worth my $5, nothing more.
Mike said…
I seems they will never get a video game movie right. High hopes for this one but sounds like a dud.

Mark Wahlberg movies seem to be hit and miss, either they really suck or they are really good.
Unknown said…
I probably wasn't going to see this one due to some of the horrible video game adaptations I've seen in the past, but I think this review cinched it for me.

I'll spend the $5.50 on an NES game or something.
Rudjard said…
almost every video game turned movie ended up flop. Resident Evil is my exception...yeah MAX PAYNE turned lame very lame even the story weren't so good. not good value for your hard-earned allowance. LOL
Anonymous said…
I just watched it. Was just fine for me. Lots of suspense in it.
The Lam said…
@Dave:
Hahaha, an NES game would be more well spent!

@rudjard:
There hasn't been any video game movie that I've really liked yet, I'm still waiting for it. But at least you enjoyed RE.

@kenwooi:
Well, I'm glad that the movie at least worked for you.

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Waid's IRREDEEMABLE (Issues #1-7)

(Note: be warned that this review is on the spoiler heavy side, so read at your own discretion if you don't want the story spoiled.) Since I was a teenager, I always had this dream that I would become a quirky movie director and I'd make a bunch of crappy little horror movies to start with, but that my first big movie would be this anti-superhero movie. I dreamed up of an Apocalypse Now -like movie using existing Marvel superheroes where Captain America would go mad, slaughtering the innocent and go into hiding somewhere 'up the river'. There would be a detective like character (possibly superhero) that would be after him, interviewing his former teammates to find out what made the all-American hero go mad. Imagine my surprise when I started reading Irredeemable . Although not exactly the story in my dreams, it's pretty close. I started reading the series this past weekend upon the glowing review that those geeks over at iFanboy put up a few weeks ago. As far a

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3!!!!!!!!!!!! (PS4)

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 is Activision’s latest entry into the bestselling Call of Duty franchise.  Developed by Treyarch Studios, the Black Ops subseries of Call of Duty games has been considered by many as the best of the COD games.  Whereas Black Ops 1 and 2 were direct sequels, BO3 seems only to be a spiritual sequel to its predecessors.  There is no direct or clear continuation of story from the previous entries.  Rather it takes the ideas of mind control and manipulation, and spins off its own story. It’s a futuristic world, where humans are infused with technology (much like Robocop!) and fight alongside and against robots.  This time around, you assume the role of an unnamed soldier, who together with your partner Hendricks and a CIA agent named Rachel Kane, track down a former Black Ops commander named John Taylor as he and his former squad appears to have gone rogue destroying CIA sites around the world.  The story will take you to Singapore, Egypt and ev

The League of Denial (2013)

The topic of concussions in sports is a dialogue that’s been growing the past number of years.  Do a search on ‘concussions’ and ‘football’ and you’ll get several thousand hits on the controversy that’s surrounded the sport.  It’s a challenging topic as the research is all relatively new, and the topic itself challenges the mentality and philosophy adopted by football loving Americans.  Now, I’m not a fan of football or NFL but when I saw this book lying at the local bookstore, my interest was piqued.  Although I’m not a fan of football, those that know me know that I’m an unabashed fan of prowrestling.  Talks about concussions are also quite a hot topic even within the prowrestling sub-culture.  Earlier this year, one of the hottest wrestlers of the current era, Daniel Bryan, retired early at the age of 34 due to a history of concussion related issues.  Interestingly, he was not permitted to return to the ring due to the disapproval by WWE’s medical director – a doctor by the name