Skip to main content

BONE TOMAHAWK!!!!!!!!!!!!


Bone Tomahawk takes place in the 1890s in a small frontier town called Bright Hope.  After the arrival of a mysterious drifter, the town is stalked by shadowy, primitive Native American characters.  They murder a local farmhand and kidnap the drifter, the female doctor and a deputy.  The Sheriff is advised by a friendly Native American that the ones who conducted the kidnapping and murder are not considered true Native Americans.  They are primitive cave dwellers referred to as troglodytes, known for their savagery, barbarism and cannibalistic tendencies.  The Sheriff assembles a team including an elderly deputy, an itchy fingered gunslinger and a civilian townsman (husband of the kidnapped doctor) to track down the troglodytes and save the townsfolk.  Together, they head out to face the dangers of the wild where the chances of survival are fleeting.

Bone Tomahawk is a perfect merger of the western and cannibal-horror genres.  Clocking at 132 minutes, it runs a bit longer than some might expect for this type of movie.  I’ve described the movie to friends as a slow burn.  For the first hour and a half, the pace is slow more akin to a western film.  Time is spent with the characters, building and journeying with them.  There’s a looming sense of dread the further our characters go on their journey.  It’s not until the last 40 minutes or so that the movie kicks it into high gear and plunges into its horror side.  And it is unrelenting!  The movie is vicious and brutal with its killings.  Because we’re dealing with primitives, their savagery knows no bounds.

And both tempos, that of the western and the horror sides, are the keys to its success.  The western side builds our emotions and the horror provides the payoff.  I guess my only gripe is that with its longer running time, perhaps some scenes on the western front could have been trimmed for a more concise 90 to 100 minute hit.


Bone Tomahawk was helmed and written by first time director, S. Craig Zahler.  According to his IMDB credentials, he has only worked on a limited number of projects, none of them high profile.  Yet, he was able to secure funds to bring this script to life, and with a star studded cast on top!  The film is filled with talented performers including Kurt Russell, Patrick Wilson, Richard Jenkins and Matthew Fox.  In more limited roles but doing exactly what’s needed is David Arquette, who plays the drifter, and horror favourite Sid Haig, who has a smaller cameo type role.  The film is working on a lower budget, no doubt, but still, you can feel those dollars stretech!


It’s worth a watch if you’re a fan of either genres.  This may be considered a preview to Kurt Russell’s other big western due later this year (Tarantino’s Hateful 8), and if he plays it like how he plays it here, we’re in for a treat!  Until next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Lion's Tale: Around the World in Spandex

As part of my "campaign of cheapness", the past 3 months I've been going to the Indigo bookstore downtown about twice a week to read Chris Jericho's autobiography A Lion's Tale: Around the World in Spandex . I'd park down for about 1.5 to 2 hours per visit and it took 3 months to do, but I finally finished it. Let it be known, that Jericho was my favourite wrestler from 1997 to 2002 (it only lasted this long because from 2002-07, I stopped watching/following wrestling completely). I learned of him during my junior high school years when me and my friends would watch WWF and WCW programming religiously. I knew there was something that stood out in Chris, it might have been his style of fighting, his comedic arrogance on the mic or his boyish good looks. Well whatever it was, I believed in him. My friends at the time were skeptical, but I would argue with them why he was so great. It was during his cruiserweight feud with Dean Malenko that really brought ou...

The League of Denial (2013)

The topic of concussions in sports is a dialogue that’s been growing the past number of years.  Do a search on ‘concussions’ and ‘football’ and you’ll get several thousand hits on the controversy that’s surrounded the sport.  It’s a challenging topic as the research is all relatively new, and the topic itself challenges the mentality and philosophy adopted by football loving Americans.  Now, I’m not a fan of football or NFL but when I saw this book lying at the local bookstore, my interest was piqued.  Although I’m not a fan of football, those that know me know that I’m an unabashed fan of prowrestling.  Talks about concussions are also quite a hot topic even within the prowrestling sub-culture.  Earlier this year, one of the hottest wrestlers of the current era, Daniel Bryan, retired early at the age of 34 due to a history of concussion related issues.  Interestingly, he was not permitted to return to the ring due to the disapproval by WWE’s medic...

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is ba...