Skip to main content

SICARIO!!!!!!!!


Sicario is a very big punch to the gut.  But one that hits you in a good way.

Sicario, as the opening moments of the movie tells us, is the Spanish word for ‘hitman’.  The movie follows FBI agent, Kate Macer (Emily Blunt), one who specializes in cases dealing with kidnappings.  In the opening scene, her team invades a house tipped off to be holding hostages somewhere in Arizona.  Instead of hostages, they find dead bodies strewn up along the house walls – victims of a Mexican drug cartel.  It’s a scene none of them are expecting, and we can tell this, because they all discharge to the front yard to vomit.  Following this case, Kate is summoned to an FBI office where she is transferred and recruited to be part of a team lead by a Department of Defense consultant named Matt (Josh Brolin).  His casual demeanor throws her off and she is unsure of what she’s getting into.  Matt’s scope of work is a bit grander than what Kate is used to.  He is spearheading missions related to the stoppage of one of the largest Mexican cartels, led by a man named Diaz.  They are aided by a shadowy and mysterious figure named Alejandro (Benicio Del Toro), whose level of involvement is unclear.  It is clear, however, that his involvement is necessary.  On their first mission, Kate is at first told that they are going on a mission in El Paso, Texas.  However, it is soon revealed that this was a lie… they are going to Juarez, across the boarder in Mexico.  From here on out, Kate has to wade through a myriad of lies to understand what exactly she is getting involved with.

Sicario is a powerful film directed by an amazing Canadian director named Denis Villeneuve who did the outstanding Canadian feature, Incendies, the enigmatic, Enemy, and also Prisoners (didn’t catch this one though).  Villeneuve seems to have no problem diving and dissecting difficult and oftentimes, uncomfortable subject matter.  The story and characters of Sicario are all layered and as the movie progresses, a darker reality is revealed.

More than anything, to me, the movie is about the conflict between ideality and reality.  One tells us how things ought to be, and the other tells us of how things are carried out in reality.  Kate, an upstanding and moral agent represents the ideals that we believe the FBI and Uncle Sam represents.  Matt, however comes from the ground up and brings in the reality of the situation.  He’s a man that perhaps at an earlier stage in life, was in Kate’s shoes and saw things through a glass dimly.  But sometimes the road owns you and likely he learned the lesson that sometimes bullets move faster than bureaucracy.  Near the end, the ideals in her literally and figuratively get punched in the gut by reality.

The film is surrounded by great performances all around.  It’s very hard to tell between Emily Blunt and Benicio Del Toro who had the stronger go around.  Each was very effective in their roles.  If anything, Blunt’s performance represents one of the strongest female lead roles since Ellen Ripley from Aliens.  She’s not a badass like Ripley, but she is strong, and holds her own ground, even when playing with all the big boys in the yard.

The movie was shot beautifully by Roger Deakins whose worked with Villeneuve before and also a frequent collaborator on Coen brothers movies.  You’ve seen his stuff!  He shoots sceneries and landscapes with such a grandiose vision.  It feels like your eyes are cutting through butter – it’s that effortless!  On top of that, the score by Jóhann Jóhannsson, may have been my favourite things about the movie.  It’s a subtle score, and it’s not so much about music as it is ambient sounds that are used to emphasize the darkness that’s revealed with each passing scene.  It’s an effective example of how less is sometimes more.  The music just accentuated the forebodingness that you knew was coming.

I was really interested in seeing Sicario in light of watching Narcos on Netflix earlier this month (write-up likely coming soon), another outing dealing with drug trafficking and cartels.  As I was watching Narcos earlier this month, I was wondering what Sicario could do that’s any different.  Everything I wanted to see and learn about was all there (in Narcos).  However, whereas Narcos gave us a full glimpse on all sides of the drug trafficking scene, Sicario is simply more interested in the stateside affairs.  Which leads into the weakest aspect of the movie.  Sicario features a small side story about a Mexican police officer and seeing him take care of his family.  It’s very clear where this little story is going, but it never really pays off.  There wasn’t really a need for this side story, but perhaps it was used to show the humanity side of the drug traffickers.  However, I did like the very last scene and it’s symbolism of how all the drug trafficking conflict is like a soccer game.  And like a game, it must continue.

I have no doubt that Sicario will be bounced around during Oscar season.  It is a solid entry in 2015.  Go see it!  Until next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Lion's Tale: Around the World in Spandex

As part of my "campaign of cheapness", the past 3 months I've been going to the Indigo bookstore downtown about twice a week to read Chris Jericho's autobiography A Lion's Tale: Around the World in Spandex . I'd park down for about 1.5 to 2 hours per visit and it took 3 months to do, but I finally finished it. Let it be known, that Jericho was my favourite wrestler from 1997 to 2002 (it only lasted this long because from 2002-07, I stopped watching/following wrestling completely). I learned of him during my junior high school years when me and my friends would watch WWF and WCW programming religiously. I knew there was something that stood out in Chris, it might have been his style of fighting, his comedic arrogance on the mic or his boyish good looks. Well whatever it was, I believed in him. My friends at the time were skeptical, but I would argue with them why he was so great. It was during his cruiserweight feud with Dean Malenko that really brought ou...

The League of Denial (2013)

The topic of concussions in sports is a dialogue that’s been growing the past number of years.  Do a search on ‘concussions’ and ‘football’ and you’ll get several thousand hits on the controversy that’s surrounded the sport.  It’s a challenging topic as the research is all relatively new, and the topic itself challenges the mentality and philosophy adopted by football loving Americans.  Now, I’m not a fan of football or NFL but when I saw this book lying at the local bookstore, my interest was piqued.  Although I’m not a fan of football, those that know me know that I’m an unabashed fan of prowrestling.  Talks about concussions are also quite a hot topic even within the prowrestling sub-culture.  Earlier this year, one of the hottest wrestlers of the current era, Daniel Bryan, retired early at the age of 34 due to a history of concussion related issues.  Interestingly, he was not permitted to return to the ring due to the disapproval by WWE’s medic...

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is ba...