Skip to main content

The Girl on the Train!!

I want to preface this by saying that I don’t usually read these types of popular fiction books – the kinds that you typically find at the front of a Chapters or an Indigo “Heather’s Pick” – but after reading such heavy stuff during the past month, I just wanted a lighter fare.  I briefly read the synopsis on Amazon and decided that this fit what I needed.

The Girl on the Train is a mystery story that is told from the perspective of a few different characters.  Firstly, there is Rachel, who is the titular girl on the train, an alcoholic young woman, who rides a train into London everyday for work.  During her daily trips to and fro, she begins to recognize some of the characters who live along the railway.  Not knowing them in person, she begins to develop characters and back stories for them – in particular, a couple whom she names Jason and Jess.  She sees increasingly odd behaviour between the two, and one day, notices that Jess disappears.  We also follow Anna, the current wife of Rachel’s ex-husband, Tom.  She is an insecure woman who reveals her claws to protect those close to her.  Interestingly enough, Anna and Tom live along the rail and are never too far from Rachel’s eyes.  And finally, we follow Megan, a young and mysterious woman who lives a few doors down from Anna and Tom.

All these perspectives revolve around the disappearance of the young woman, “Jess”.  But with inconsistent stories and shady motives, whose story can we really trust?

Ultimately, the story is enjoyable, although I don’t feel like the third act stuck the landing.  It’s not a complete mystery with what happened regarding the missing woman and who was involved, but it just felt like the motives were a bit tried and brought nothing new to the table.  You can really see the story brought onto the silver screen (note that the filming rights were purchased by Dreamworks!).  It has that broad general appeal that will make the film a success.  However, I did have a problem with some of the writing.  For example, we learn early on that Rachel is an alcoholic.  From then on, it seems that every other page during Rachel’s story, talks about how she wants a drink.  We get it.  She’s an alcoholic.  She likes to drink.  The point doesn’t need to be brought up so often.  It’s at these moments where I rolled my eyes.

This is author Paula Hawkin’s first major book release and is a worldwide hit.  She’s written a few romantic novels in the past under a pseudonym, but the Girl on the Train is the first penned under her real name.  There is much comparison out there with Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl and it’s very easy to see where the comparisons are coming from.  They both follow the beat of a thriller/suspense story with bouncing perspectives.  The trust of the perspectives in both stories is always in question, so there’s that same sense of dread, tension and forebodingness.  And perhaps it’s this aspect that brings the closest comparison.  I should note that I haven’t read Gone Girl, only read the book which I understand follows the book quite closely.  Overall, if I had to compare the two, I enjoyed Gone Girl more only because the ending was a bit more ambiguous and open ended.  The Girl on the Train follows a more conventional story arc and thus, ends how you would expect things to end.

As a popular fiction novel, it’s an enjoyable read and it’s never offensive.  But if this isn’t your usual thing, you’re not missing out on too much!  Until next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dreamers, Achievers, Believers

It was quite a week last week. It started off on a more heavy note last Sunday, but as the week wore on, things became better and more clear. So let's do a little recap. This is going to be kind of long, so if you find this kind of stuff boring I've inserted pictures of funny cats for your entertainment. So... 1.5 Weeks Ago About 1.5 weeks ago, my friend Jon from Living Room gave me the contact info for his uncle. His uncle is an engineer and apparently was looking for new grads and new hands to hire. That week, I gave him a few calls but he wasn't there when I called him and when he returned my calls, I wasn't here either. We were playing phone tag that week *insert schoolgirl giggle*. Sunday Morning So last Sunday morning, his uncle gave me a call at 9 am (The morning! My weakness! HISS!) and we talked about stuff. I was telling him a bit about school as well as elaborating my work/coop experience as he didn't have my resume yet. So he goes on to tell

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here ). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have. In The Science of God , Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible. The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will. In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genes

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is