Skip to main content

A Peace of Work and the Work of Peace


“If you want to enjoy life and see many happy days, keep your tongue from speaking evil and your lips from telling lies.  Turn away from evil and do good.  Search for peace, and work to maintain it.  The eyes of the Lord watch over those who do right, and his ears are open to their prayers. But the Lord turns his face against those who do evil.”

-1 Peter 3:10-12 (NLT)

I’ve been thinking a lot about this piece of scripture since I read it a few weeks back.  Something about the way that the scripture speaks of peace just really resonated with me.

To me, peace is something that I’ve never really given a thought about.  If I had to boil it down to a process, there’s a moment when you hit peace, you realize it, you pump your fist and you carry on.  Or at least, that’s the way I’ve always perceived it.

The scripture says that we must “work to maintain it”.  It may sound nerdy, but I started thinking about the science behind ‘work’.  From a physics standpoint, work is the dot product of a force and a displacement.  The displacement implies that there must be some movement behind it; some change between where you’re at and where you’re going.  Peace is something that’s dynamic; it isn’t something that’s just achieved.  Peace is something that must be maintained and it needs work.  It isn’t something passive, but rather something that is active; it’s moving, it has life.

I think about the relationships I have with the people around me, both family and friends and I believe I’m a peaceful person. 

I think about growing up at home, my relationship with both my siblings and parents.  If I look at the big picture, we hardly fought.  I can count on one hand the number of major arguments I’ve had with my parents.  There were always disagreements, but never “fights”.  The same goes for me and my siblings.  In fact, I don’t know that we’ve ever fought (if they’re reading this, maybe you can remind me if we did?).  I think it’s why whenever my friends tell me that they get into arguments with their siblings, I get curious.  How does that come about and what sort of things would you argue about? 

Then I look at the relationships I have with my friends, and the arguments are even less than the ones above combined.  But if anything, I’ve probably offended people by things I’ve said, opinions and thoughts prematurely spouted.  So if I’ve ever made anyone feel “unpeaceful” with me, I am sorry.

And then I have to think about the relationship with myself.  You know that place where the head, heart and soul collide?  This is the area in my life with the most unrest, the most fights and the most wars.  This, dear reader, is where I can say that there isn’t as much peace.  Between these three parts, one is always battling another, or, there’s a handicap match, or, there’s a triple threat match.  The internal struggle is like a prowrestling dream!

So how shall I bring peace amongst these rivals?  And what can be done to maintain it?

I’m thinking that something that needs to be maintained would require consistency, and when I think of consistency as a Christian, the first thing that pops into my mind is prayer.  Prayer needs to be continual.

And when I look at myself, it makes sense, I think that’s why there’s that feeling of unrest lately – I haven’t been praying as consistently as I used to.  It’s been playing second fiddle to the iPad or a Batman book (note: I can only hope that by realizing this, that God won’t smote the iPad or the Batman books… I’m learning my lesson, no need for drastic measures, God).  So I’ve been changing my prayer habits recently.  Rather than praying one large prayer at a certain time, I’ll pray shorter prayers throughout the day, when I’m reminded that there’s something that I need to pray about. 

Either way, I realize that I need to strengthen this part of my spiritual life.  I need focus and I think that focus will bring about peace.  But again, it’s something I’ll need to work at.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have.

In The Science of God, Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible.

The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will.

In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genesis. Duri…

DTV Madness: Jack Brooks - M.S. and Gingerdead Man 2

Okay, honestly, I think this will be the last DTV post for a while. One man can only take so much shit. I'm only human, I have feelings too. These two movies pushed my limit. I'm going to be in DTV-detox for the next month or so.

Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer

I thought that with a title like this, it couldn't fail. I thought that with a poster like they had, it couldn't fail. Then I realized something... I failed. I failed in thinking that this movie had any hope.

I was expecting some fun horror, mixed with comedy in sort of a Buffy the Vampire Slayer kind of fashion with a bumbling hero and smart quips. I mean, with a title like Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer, was I wrong in expecting a variety of monsters get slayed as the title suggests?

It didn't help much that the monsters looked uber cheesy. They looked like something right out of a Power Rangers episode. But to their credit, at least they stuck with practical make-up and effects rather than CG.

The movie its…

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong?

Pacing.

If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game?

Max Payne is based…