Skip to main content


It was only 5 years ago that Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man franchise came to an end, resulting in a separation between Raimi and Sony Pictures.  Yes, the much maligned 3rd movie had its share of problems both on and behind the screen.  As a friend pointed out to me recently, “think about it... Forman was Venom!”.  Five years later, and I’m still trying to digest it.  Preposterous!  Well, Sony, not one to back down on the possibility of bags and bags of money, made the genius decision to reboot the franchise.  Now, under the helm of Marc Webb, the untold story begins anew.

The Amazing Spider-Man tells the untold origin story, again, of the titular web-swinging hero.  This time around, they add slightly more to the context behind his parents, with his father being a scientist alongside Dr. Curt Connors.  After what is seemingly an accident involving the death of his parents, Peter Parker moves in with his Aunt May and Uncle Ben.  Parker, now grown up, discovers some of his father’s research papers and works, and seeks to continue his research by aiding Curt Connors at Oscorp.  After sneaking into one of Oscorp’s laboratories, Parker is bit by a radioactive spider, and well, you know the rest.  Connors now able to continue his research on human regeneration, experiments on himself, only to ultimately become the infamous “The Lizard”... (snoutless).  Connors, although with good intentions, seeks to eliminate the physical weakness in the human species, but fails to see the consequence of enacting his plan (i.e. his serum makes you EVIL!).  And of course, it’s up to Spider-Man to stop him.

Of all the superhero releases this summer, the Amazing Spider-Man clearly had the least clout.  The hype around the other superhero releases overshadowed the young web swinger.  It didn’t help that the movie is a reboot of a very recent franchise, leaving many wondering ‘huh?’.  On top of that, the marketing campaign behind it wasn’t exactly inspired, with the focus on “seeing the untold story”.  Really?  Because we saw it 10 years ago.  But as a geek, I’m behooved to see any movie with Spider-Man in it.  And you know, despite all this preamble, I enjoyed it.  Which surprised me most of all, because most of the trailers leading up to it, I thought were kinda shitty and boring.  Now, it is nowhere as good as Raimi’s Spider-Man 1 and 2 (of which 2 is nearly the perfect sequel and probably one of my favourite action movies), but it is leaps better than 3.

Going in, I had doubts about Marc Webb in the director’s seat as he’s not typically known as an action movie kind of guy, but he really nails down the fun in this.  Webb, known more for scripts and stories involving relationships integrates his forte into ASM.  The strength of the movie is on the relationships Peter Parker has with all the people surrounding his life.  Action and set pieces are not the focus here.  That said, sometimes when the scenes got mushy, the dialogue got extra cheesy.  I’m quite sure at one point I was the only person in the auditorium that laughed out loud at the cheesiness of the dialogue, triggering a chain reaction of laughter and slaps on foreheads in the theater.  Well, I hope they were laughing with me.

I thought all the main players were great in the movie. I mean Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone as Parker and Gwen Stacy respectively were good, but I really loved all the side players like Martin Sheen as Uncle Ben, Sally Field as Aunt May and Dennis Leary as Captain Stacy.  It’s more of Garfield’s interaction with each character that I enjoyed watching, especially with Sheen.  He seems like he could be everybody’s uncle.
Of what I can recall, I only have two gripes with the movie.

The first has to do with the decision making of one Peter Parker.  Now, I can believe that a teenager bit by a radioactive spider could gain superhuman powers and become a hero to New York City.  But I CANNOT believe that a teenager would use BING.COM as a search engine!!!  As soon as I saw that, it took me out of the fantasy and reminded me that it was all fake and that I was watching a movie.  I can only suspend so much belief.  But maybe the kids these days ARE using BING.COM.  And if that’s the case, it brings about the question: what’s in our milk?

The second has to do with the score.  And this can actually be a knock against the original Spider-Man trilogy… or heck, ALL Marvel based films.  What each of them has lacked is a memorable or iconic score.  The music is so generic.  There’s nothing with the music that connects me to the superhero, unlike that of Batman or Superman.  With those two franchises, I feel like the music adds to the theme and creates an emotional experience during viewings.  I haven’t yet felt the same with any of the Marvel films.

On a very minor note, and not really a gripe, is the snoutless The Lizard.  I didn’t really like the look or design of The Lizard in the movie.  I don’t know if the snout would have helped, but I think they could have done more to lizard him.  Movements and what not.  He seemed very generic as a villain, with a tail as an added feature.  Still, although sort of generic looking, he did seem menacing as Spider-Man’s rival, and that’s why this is reduced as a minor gripe.  And part of me cries inside, because I was hoping to see Dylan Baker eventually become The Lizard in the original trilogy of Spider-Man.

But these are only minor gripes (although that BING.COM…), and doesn’t necessarily detract from the overall experience.  It is definitely worth a viewing, and now that everyone’s filling in the auditoriums to see Batman, it’s the perfect time.  Til then, later geeks!


Popular posts from this blog

R.I.P. Evan Tanner

The body of the professional fighter and former UFC champion, Evan Tanner, 37, was found in the Palo Verde mountain area of California on September 8th, 2008. He was found a few miles away from his campsite on foot, with no water, where the temperatures were around 110 degrees fahrenheit. The coroner's report listed the cause of death as from heat exposure.

Tanner left Oceanside, California on September 2nd. On September 4th, he sent a text message to a friend telling him that his motorcycle was out of gas, that he was out of water, and if his friend didn't hear from him the next day, to call the authorities. Unfortunately, Evan never returned home.

I'm not the hugest MMA fan, I consider myself a casual fan, and a n00b at best. I was listening to Dave Meltzer and Bryan Alvarez of the Wrestling Observer Radio, and the story of Tanner's life sounded intriguing.

As fantastic as it sounds, Tanner ventured into the deserts in search of treasure and adventure. I kid you …

DTV Madness: Jack Brooks - M.S. and Gingerdead Man 2

Okay, honestly, I think this will be the last DTV post for a while. One man can only take so much shit. I'm only human, I have feelings too. These two movies pushed my limit. I'm going to be in DTV-detox for the next month or so.

Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer

I thought that with a title like this, it couldn't fail. I thought that with a poster like they had, it couldn't fail. Then I realized something... I failed. I failed in thinking that this movie had any hope.

I was expecting some fun horror, mixed with comedy in sort of a Buffy the Vampire Slayer kind of fashion with a bumbling hero and smart quips. I mean, with a title like Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer, was I wrong in expecting a variety of monsters get slayed as the title suggests?

It didn't help much that the monsters looked uber cheesy. They looked like something right out of a Power Rangers episode. But to their credit, at least they stuck with practical make-up and effects rather than CG.

The movie its…

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have.

In The Science of God, Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible.

The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will.

In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genesis. Duri…