Skip to main content

A Pixel in God's Eyes


The other night, our church hosted a small gathering that was dubbed, “Theology on Tap”.  The idea was to head to a pub, somewhere casual and just talk theology.  Some points of discussion included the simplicity of God and also the grandness of God or the “Godness of God”, as our pastor quipped.  One person remarked that despite the grandness and infiniteness of God, that you, as a finite being, still matter.

During the discussion, I was trying to process some points and understand things in terms of geek analogies.

I started wondering if God sees the world in full high definition 1080p, and at the bare minimum, with a  refresh rate of 60 Hz.  At the same time, how each of us is like a single pixel on that globally expansive LED screen.  Our job as a pixel is simple; we are called to emit a light.  The light you emit can be of various colours and although you may be just a single pixel emitting a certain colour at a certain time, combined with all the other pixels surrounding you, you create this rich tapestry that reflects life.  You, as a pixel.

However, there are times when you get dead pixels or error pixels.  These are pixels that are physically there, but for whatever reason, they don’t emit a light and colour.

I don’t know if you’ve ever encountered a dead pixel on any of your screens, be it on the TV, computer or phone, but amongst all the millions of pixels that you see, if you get even a single dead pixel, it will stick out to you.  You can do all you want to pretend that it’s not there, but pretend all you want, because it’s there, and you notice it.  To the viewer, it matters.  And of course, you want to get it fixed.  So although it may be one pixel amidst a sea of millions of pixels, it still matters.  You want it to have colour again.  The picture is only full once they all produce light.

I wonder if God sees us in some sort of similar way.  That when we aren’t shining as bright as we are, that He would notice it and work to fix it.

But the analogy only goes so far.  I mean, when you get a dead pixel on your electronic device, you can get it repaired or replaced, and the dead pixel has no say in the matter (*spoilers* the pixel doesn’t have a soul).  But we do.  And we have a relationship too.  He may want to fix us and may want us to emit light, but because it’s a relationship, it only works if you want it too.  He may want to fix you, but you have to want to be fixed.  But it goes a bit further, because before you realize that you ought to be fixed, you have to first understand that you’re broken.

It’s not an easy process and I don’t think many will claim it is.  After all, it’s difficult for a pixel to see itself.  Be patient.  Keep listening.  Listen to see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dreamers, Achievers, Believers

It was quite a week last week. It started off on a more heavy note last Sunday, but as the week wore on, things became better and more clear. So let's do a little recap. This is going to be kind of long, so if you find this kind of stuff boring I've inserted pictures of funny cats for your entertainment. So... 1.5 Weeks Ago About 1.5 weeks ago, my friend Jon from Living Room gave me the contact info for his uncle. His uncle is an engineer and apparently was looking for new grads and new hands to hire. That week, I gave him a few calls but he wasn't there when I called him and when he returned my calls, I wasn't here either. We were playing phone tag that week *insert schoolgirl giggle*. Sunday Morning So last Sunday morning, his uncle gave me a call at 9 am (The morning! My weakness! HISS!) and we talked about stuff. I was telling him a bit about school as well as elaborating my work/coop experience as he didn't have my resume yet. So he goes on to tell

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here ). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have. In The Science of God , Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible. The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will. In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genes

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is