Skip to main content

CABIN IN THE WOODS!!!!!!!!

Cabin in the Woods is not what you expect.

I first heard about the movie when it played AICN’s Butt-Numb-A-Thon 2012, and adhered to the recommendations to avoid everything you can about Cabin in the Woods.  And rightly so as the fun with the movie is everything you don’t know about it. 

So aside from seeing the trailer last year, I knew nothing of the movie.  And even then, I didn’t recall what was in the trailer, so as far as I was concerned, I went in fresh.

On the outset, Cabin in the Woods is a straight-up horror movie, following five college students as they head to a countryside cottage for some R&R.  All the typical horror archetypes are represented: the jock, the sweet and innocent virgin, the slutty slut, the thoughtful and articulate smart guy (note: not nerd), and the pot smoking, comedic relief.  We also bounce between two laboratory technician characters who are monitoring the students for some mysterious reason.  Just what are they up to?  And why are they so cryptic?

As horror movies go, things aren’t what they seem.  And not only that, but the things behind the things aren’t what they seem.  And I’ll go no further.  To say anything more would be to completely ruin the movie.

The flick was directed by Drew Goddard, of Cloverfield fame, and was co-scripted and produced by frequent collaborator, Joss Whedon, as well.  The movie clearly has a Whedon-esque vibe, complete with its dark sense of humour, especially the end sequence which seemed like it could have been something right out of an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

In an interview with Whedon on TotalFilm.com, Whedon describes the movie as a “Loving Hate Letter” to horror.  It’s a critique at everything that he and Goddard love and hate about the genre, and more specifically, the devolution of the genre.  And it’s true.  How many horror movies have you seen in the last few years that didn’t involve either found footage or torture?

In a way Cabin in the Woods reminded me of the first Scream movie, where during viewing I was focused more on the subtext and statement rather than the actual story.  Horror movies like these are great, but they need to be taken in doses.  You can’t have two of these in the same year.

I think last year’s Insidious proved, critically and financially, that all you need is a solid story and direction, to scare people into and not out of the theaters.  All you need is some sense of co-ordination, you don’t even need a completely original story.  You just need to know how to tell it.  Shock factor is passe.  They’re cheap thrills and don’t leave a lasting taste.

The thought that went across my mind as the credits began to roll was how would everyone else receive it?  On one hand, it’s received praise nearly across the board from the critics.  On the other hand, the end product is quite a niche product.  Genre nerds will likely love it and get more out of it than the layperson will.

In the end, it’s hard for me to truly recommend this to everyone despite its greatness.  If you’re a gorehound or a horror nerd, then you’ve probably already seen it, so there’s no more to say.  However, if you are just a regular appreciator of horror, I think you’ll probably find more entertaining movies from the lexicon of horror.  Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW HAIKUS!!!! (#3)

It's time for another edition of Review Haikus; a feature I like to write when I'm too lazy to write out full reviews~!!! The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 Tony Scott schlockfest~! All his movies seem the same. A needless remake. Denzel's a bad-ass. Given up on Travolta. 1 of 2 ain't bad. Public Enemies Well? Disappointed. I expected more from Mann. The pacing felt off. Acting was good though. Man-crush on Depp and Bale. 5 more syllables! Saw VI Yes, another Saw. Harder to tell them apart. Blood, guts, bad story. Why more Saw movies? Each movie makes less and less. End this series now. ====== Later geeks!

Lt. Aldo Raine wants his scalps!!!!!!!!!!!!

I missed The Inglorious Basterds during its theatrical run and it's a shame too because I'm a fool for Tarantino movies. But I finally got to see it this weekend and I'm happy to say that I mostly enjoyed it. I don't think it's his best movie, but it was damned entertaining. The Inglorious Basterds takes place during World War II and tells its story by following three different groups of characters: from Lt. Aldo Raine and his squad of soldiers infamously known as the Basterds, Col. Hans Landa, a Nazi colonel better known as "The Jew Hunter", and from a young Jewish girl named Shosanna, who had her family murdered by Col. Landa. We follow the Basterds in their Nazi killing business (and business is good) as they lay out a plan to take out several high ranking officials all at once. We follow Shosanna as she operates her theater and lays down her own plans in exacting revenge on the Nazis. And of course, the "Jew Hunter" is hot on their trail

Sam Raimi's Dragging Someone To Hell!!!

It's great to see Sam Raimi back in his form with his latest entry Drag Me To Hell . Simply glorious, it is a horror geek's dream. This is the Sam we all know and love from Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness , before he got all caught up in the comic book geek universe of Spider-Man . After 10 years (from the first time I watched Evil Dead 2 ), he has remained my favourite film director... although he did try my patience with Spider-Man 3 . I know this euphoria that I'm feeling now will be short lived, as even as I type this review, Raimi is already at work on the pre-production of Spider-Man 4 (yay?). So what is there to say about Drag Me To Hell ? This is the way a summer movie should be, touching on all those senses that make movie going an actual experience. There were thrills, chills, laughs and cheers; the way things should be! Drag Me To Hell tells a story of a young loan officer named Christine, who in an effort to advance her own career, has to turn down an