Skip to main content

Torsten Krol's CALLISTO!!

From around Christmas time, I had a good momentum going in terms of reading the stack of books I’ve got lying beside my bed. I knocked out 3 titles in the span of a month, which for me, is a fast pace. But when I started reading Torsten Krol’s Callisto, the pace grinded to a near halt. It’s not that it’s a bad story, but I just never felt that connection with the characters as I had with the last book I read (that being Slam by Nick Hornby, love, love, love).

Callisto follows a big lummox of a character named Deefus Odell (an astute individual, as you can tell by that name). Deefus is from the south and isn’t the brightest crayon, but somehow he manages to get by. Without a clear direction in life, he decides that the only thing to do is to join the army and serve the country. He drives across Kansas to hopefully do just that. Unfortunately, his Chevy breaks down in the middle of this small town called Callisto and it’s here where all the fun begins.

He meets a local yokel named Dean who helps him out by setting him up with his lawn mowing business. By pure accident, Deefus accidently kills Dean one night which sets off a series of events, putting him at the center of a terrorism situation, involving the news media, drug dealers, the FBI, the government and the church. If it all sounds zany, well it is. The story is a satire on the state of the US and the war on terror.

I picked it up at the book store not knowing too much about it. I read the back, was intrigued and also quickly browsed some reviews online before picking it up. One of the reviews I read described the story as Forrest Gump-like, which I was sold on. However, that analogy is very loose. Deefus is Forrest Gump-like in that he’s naïve and a bit slow, but that’s where the comparisons end. Because of his southern charm, it’s hard to avoid the comparison of Deefus’ speaking skills to that of George Dubya, which provides some good comedy.

The story was a bit too slow moving for me, that plus the characters that I couldn’t connect to made it a difficult read to plow through. However, the last third of the book moves well when pieces of the puzzle start coming together. Still, the ending leaves a bit more to be desired. The story is laced with dark and oftentimes, odd humour. But at the same time, it's never laugh out loud type humour.

Author Torsten Krol is a bit of an enigma himself. He supposedly resides in Australia, but not very much else is known about the elusive author. Some say that it’s just a pseudonym for a more well known author and interestingly, some claim that he is Stephen King. I think a story about this mysterious Krol would be more interesting, if it is indeed Stephen King.

For me, the book is a tough recommend only because the pacing didn’t work for me. If you’re up for reading a satire then I suppose it might work for you. Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dreamers, Achievers, Believers

It was quite a week last week. It started off on a more heavy note last Sunday, but as the week wore on, things became better and more clear. So let's do a little recap. This is going to be kind of long, so if you find this kind of stuff boring I've inserted pictures of funny cats for your entertainment. So... 1.5 Weeks Ago About 1.5 weeks ago, my friend Jon from Living Room gave me the contact info for his uncle. His uncle is an engineer and apparently was looking for new grads and new hands to hire. That week, I gave him a few calls but he wasn't there when I called him and when he returned my calls, I wasn't here either. We were playing phone tag that week *insert schoolgirl giggle*. Sunday Morning So last Sunday morning, his uncle gave me a call at 9 am (The morning! My weakness! HISS!) and we talked about stuff. I was telling him a bit about school as well as elaborating my work/coop experience as he didn't have my resume yet. So he goes on to tell

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here ). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have. In The Science of God , Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible. The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will. In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genes

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is