Skip to main content

Liam Neeson in UNKNOWN!!!!!!!!!

Apparently (from what I’ve read and heard) the movie was marketed completely identical to Taken, from 2 years ago. Taken is a movie that I love for its showcasing of Liam Neeson in a total badass form. Now, besides seeing the poster, I knew nothing about Unknown except for what my friend told me shortly before we walked into the theater. I don’t even think I’ve seen the trailer beforehand. All I knew was that from the poster,

The story follows a scientist named Martin Harris (Liam Neeson) who arrives in Germany with his wife (January Jones) for a conference. Shortly after arriving at their hotel, he realizes that his luggage and identification was left at the airport and takes a cab back to retrieve it. However, on their way back, the cab gets into a little traffic scrimmage and ends up going off a bridge into the river below. Harris is trapped and drowns, that is until the superhero-like cab driver rescues and resuscitates him. He wakes up at a local hospital, and finds it odd that no one knows who he is or where he came from. He returns back to the hotel to find that not everything is as it once seemed; he finds his wife, but unfortunately, she does not recognize him. And in fact, some stranger is posing as her husband, and claims to be exactly him, Martin Harris. A mystery, dear reader, is afoot!

As a whole, the movie is solidly-pretty-alright; a 3 out of 3 on the 7 out of 10 scale, I’ve been saying. I think where Taken has the edge is with its intense action. Unknown is more methodic and slow-plodding, more apt for a mystery story, for which it mostly is. It’s not until the last 20 to 30 minutes where we see some semblance of action.

There is the one sort-of-plothole that stuck out to me. Oh, and I should preface this with a mild ***SEMI-SPOILER WARNING***. Why is it that when Liam Neeson remembers everything prior to the car crash, that all of a sudden he decides to be a good guy? I mean, with everything before the car accident and drowning, he was technically a bad guy. What reasons did he have to have a change of heart? Shouldn’t he have been like, oh yeah, I was a bad guy, commence evil. Moreover, as a former assassin, he pretty much is a wimp until the last act of the movie. Definitely not the Jason-Bourne-style of memory loss.***SEMI-SPOILERS OVER!***

What made the movie enjoyable is Liam Neeson. He has this very commanding onscreen presence where if he talked, you were sure to listen. He did not pwn as much as in Taken, but he made up for it with some strangely timed one-liners. Aidan Quinn on the otherhand, as the villain, I couldn’t buy. He just doesn’t come across as a believable bad guy. Frank Langella on the otherhand, even before he says anything, you know he’s up to something. Langella has a knack for playing this type of character; an ominous and mystery well-dressed old man.

As a whole, it’s worth a rental at worst. If you’ve got the time and money, then on the big screen couldn’t hurt. It’s a zany story, but thanks to Liam Neeson, it works. Until next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

R.I.P. Evan Tanner

The body of the professional fighter and former UFC champion, Evan Tanner, 37, was found in the Palo Verde mountain area of California on September 8th, 2008. He was found a few miles away from his campsite on foot, with no water, where the temperatures were around 110 degrees fahrenheit. The coroner's report listed the cause of death as from heat exposure.

Tanner left Oceanside, California on September 2nd. On September 4th, he sent a text message to a friend telling him that his motorcycle was out of gas, that he was out of water, and if his friend didn't hear from him the next day, to call the authorities. Unfortunately, Evan never returned home.

I'm not the hugest MMA fan, I consider myself a casual fan, and a n00b at best. I was listening to Dave Meltzer and Bryan Alvarez of the Wrestling Observer Radio, and the story of Tanner's life sounded intriguing.

As fantastic as it sounds, Tanner ventured into the deserts in search of treasure and adventure. I kid you …

DTV Madness: Jack Brooks - M.S. and Gingerdead Man 2

Okay, honestly, I think this will be the last DTV post for a while. One man can only take so much shit. I'm only human, I have feelings too. These two movies pushed my limit. I'm going to be in DTV-detox for the next month or so.

Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer

I thought that with a title like this, it couldn't fail. I thought that with a poster like they had, it couldn't fail. Then I realized something... I failed. I failed in thinking that this movie had any hope.

I was expecting some fun horror, mixed with comedy in sort of a Buffy the Vampire Slayer kind of fashion with a bumbling hero and smart quips. I mean, with a title like Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer, was I wrong in expecting a variety of monsters get slayed as the title suggests?

It didn't help much that the monsters looked uber cheesy. They looked like something right out of a Power Rangers episode. But to their credit, at least they stuck with practical make-up and effects rather than CG.

The movie its…

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have.

In The Science of God, Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible.

The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will.

In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genesis. Duri…