Skip to main content

ADJUSTMENT BUREAU... I wish they could re-adjust my time

Well, at least I didn't go in with high expectations.

I didn't know too much about the movie going in; it was a story by Philip K. Dick and it seemed Inception-like. And in some ways, it was, but not in a good way. You see, I had the same problem with The Adjustment Bureau as I did with Inception. Both movies introduced these really cool, geeky and intriguing ideas but they were all used to pull off such a small scope of story. In Inception, it was a heist movie, in Bureau, it was a love story.

The story follows a young and hopeful US politician named David Norris who is running for a seat in the Senate. Despite his popularity, he fails to win the election after a would-be scandal jeopardizes his campaign. He bumps into a young woman hiding in the men’s bathroom stalls, who not only encourages him but charms him, inspiring him to go rogue in his concession speech. The speech takes off with the crowd, giving him an upward momentum in the next election. But was he supposed to bump into the woman? The next day as he heads to work, lo and behold, he bumps into the woman again, this time on the bus. Is it fated? Cue in the Bureau. Norris happens upon them by chance. The Bureau is represented by a group of well dressed men in business suits and ominous looking characters in SWAT outfits. The Bureau is not of our world. The Bureau controls or "adjusts" our actions behind the scenes. When things don't go according to the "Chairman's" plans, your life will be re-adjusted to get you back on track. The rest of the movie follows Norris around as he struggles with the intentions of the Bureau while searching for his love... this woman that he keeps bumping into.

At the end of the movie, me and my brother looked at each other and said, “is that it?”. The auditorium collectively groaned. I think we all felt a victim of the ol’ bait-and-switch. Beforehand, I had only seen the trailer once or twice, but I was under the impression that it was going to be this sci-fi-ish action-y thriller. I was wrong. We all were.

This was a geek romance movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ARRRRRGHGGHH!

Thank goodness for Matt Damon. While the movie was no good for me, I still enjoy his acting. Doubly delightful is Emily Blunt, who I don't think I've ever seen in a movie before. I know her more as John Krasinski's wife than for her acting creds. She's pretty babetastic, it's no wonder Matt Damon's character searches years for her. Rounding out the named stars is General Zod himself, Terence Stamp. He pretty much plays the role that Frank Langella did in the Unknown last month.

While as a whole I didn't enjoy the movie, I did find redeeming things about the movie. The thing that made me go, “wha~!?”, was the subject matter of God (or the Chairman as they call it) and the idea of your life’s plans. Are you in control of them or are they completely someone else's? Hmmm. The whole idea is explored throughout the movie. The idea of life's plans and freewill are bounced around back and forth. It's interesting. It’s not a Christian standpoint at all, but more from a generic theological perspective. So if that subject matter piques your interest, Bureau might not hurt.

Anyhow, I didn't like it a whole lot, I'd say it's worth a rent or an On-Demand order at best. Go in with expectations low... like real low... don't expect action... expect kissing and romance and gooey stuff, and then I suppose you'll enjoy it. Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dreamers, Achievers, Believers

It was quite a week last week. It started off on a more heavy note last Sunday, but as the week wore on, things became better and more clear. So let's do a little recap. This is going to be kind of long, so if you find this kind of stuff boring I've inserted pictures of funny cats for your entertainment. So... 1.5 Weeks Ago About 1.5 weeks ago, my friend Jon from Living Room gave me the contact info for his uncle. His uncle is an engineer and apparently was looking for new grads and new hands to hire. That week, I gave him a few calls but he wasn't there when I called him and when he returned my calls, I wasn't here either. We were playing phone tag that week *insert schoolgirl giggle*. Sunday Morning So last Sunday morning, his uncle gave me a call at 9 am (The morning! My weakness! HISS!) and we talked about stuff. I was telling him a bit about school as well as elaborating my work/coop experience as he didn't have my resume yet. So he goes on to tell

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here ). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have. In The Science of God , Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible. The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will. In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genes

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is