Skip to main content

The Green Hornet!!!!!!!!

Green Hornet. Despite all the negative reviews out there, I thought that the movie was very, very, very… okay. It had good action, it provided some good laughs, thus satiating the crave for an action comedy. The story wasn’t the greatest, but I liked their approach to the concept. It was their attempt at turning the story into a buddy action comedy that I liked. Superheroes are sort of wacky as it is (the original Green Hornet not withstanding), so going for the comedy angle was appreciated. But that said, it was probably the weakest movie written by Seth Rogen and childhood pal, Evan Goldberg, and an even weaker attempt by mastermind director, Michel Gondry. It didn’t feel as polished as any of their previous efforts.

The story follows Britt Reid, the son of a wealthy newspaper owner, who lives the highlife as a socialite of sorts; sleeping by day and partying by night. One day his father dies from a freak bee sting, and Britt is handed the reigns as the new owner. He disregards his responsibilities until he meets his father’s enigmatic mechanic/coffee maker, Kato. Kato is sort of like Britt’s gateway drug into the world of ass-kicking. The first time they fend off a group of thugs, he gets a little bloodlust and craves for more. This fuels an idea he has to become a superhero who poses as a villain in order to get closer to the true villains, and eventually take them out. Unfortunately for him and Kato, the biggest crime lord in the city, Chudnofsky, sets off on a tear against them for disrupting his business.

The action in the movie is fun, with its video-game-like slow motion and visual style. It’s definitely the strongest point of the movie. The comedy itself is sub-par and definitely not as risque when compared to other Rogen movies, but that might be because of the more lax rating. It has its moments though! Story-wise, it’s very ‘meh’, nothing that will blow you away, but I will say that I was thoroughly entertained during the last 15-20 minutes. The way they tied up the loose ends had me rolling!

Seth Rogen (a really trimmed down Seth Rogen) plays the same sort of Seth-Rogen-character you find in his other movies. He’s still the bumbling, non-alpha male hero, but this time around adds an arrogant edge, based on his character’s wealth and fame. What really made the movie for me (and I think most people) was Jay Chou as Kato. He kicked all sorts of butt throughout the whole movie, with his Matrix-like fighting skills. Unfortunately, it was sort of ruined anytime he had to talk. God bless the guy, but there were times when I didn’t catch a single word he said because his accent was so strong. But really, he made up for his lack of oratory skills with his ass kicking skills. While Christoph Waltz is an outstanding actor, his role as the main villain wasn’t given much. He was a one-dimensional, I-want-to-do-crime-type character that more filled out a role than embodied one. But, it’s not his fault, he was great doing what he was given, which for me, wasn’t enough.

The biggest surprise of this movie was a cameo from someone I would have never expected: Edward Furlong!!!!! John Connor himself! And boy, he didn’t look good. I’ve heard that he’s an addict of sorts and it shows. That’s the type of makeup that Hollywood can’t buy! I get the feeling that the producers found him going through the garbage in the alley of the film lot and yelled to him, “Hey Eddie, is that you? Wanna be in a movie? Just say these lines!”. And away he went!

So yah, if you're going to see this movie for any reason, see it for Edward Furlong! Just for the shock factor! If you're going to watch this, go on a Tuesday when tickets are cheaper and also, forget the 3D, that will save you a few more bucks. Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dreamers, Achievers, Believers

It was quite a week last week. It started off on a more heavy note last Sunday, but as the week wore on, things became better and more clear. So let's do a little recap. This is going to be kind of long, so if you find this kind of stuff boring I've inserted pictures of funny cats for your entertainment. So... 1.5 Weeks Ago About 1.5 weeks ago, my friend Jon from Living Room gave me the contact info for his uncle. His uncle is an engineer and apparently was looking for new grads and new hands to hire. That week, I gave him a few calls but he wasn't there when I called him and when he returned my calls, I wasn't here either. We were playing phone tag that week *insert schoolgirl giggle*. Sunday Morning So last Sunday morning, his uncle gave me a call at 9 am (The morning! My weakness! HISS!) and we talked about stuff. I was telling him a bit about school as well as elaborating my work/coop experience as he didn't have my resume yet. So he goes on to tell

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here ). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have. In The Science of God , Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible. The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will. In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genes

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is