Skip to main content

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is the first huge budget video-game-to-movie adaptation in a while. But with failure after failure in other franchises, will Prince of Persia be the movie that finally brings success to the genre or will it be another dud?

Prince of Persia tells the story of a young prince named Dastan, who when a child, was nothing but a lowly thief scouring the streets of Persia. After a chance meeting with the king where he witnessed Dastan's courage, he was led to adopt him into his royal family. Dastan, now older, fights alongside his brothers, protecting the land of Persia from their neighbouring enemies. On one particular battle, Dastan comes across a sacred dagger, a treasure to their enemies, with the power to reverse time. During a celebration after the battle victory, an act of treason occurs within the royal family and Dastan finds himself in the middle of a ploy orchestrated by someone close to him. Along with Princess Tamina, from the neighbouring nation, Dastan seeks to uncover the truth behind the crime perpetrated against his family.

The rights were picked up by Disney a few years ago with hopes that they could turn this video game franchise into one of their summer tentpoles similarly to Pirates of the Caribbean.

Plotwise, it was a by-the-numbers kind of a story. You knew where things were headed at almost all times. This made it sort of funny to watch. In the beginning of the movie, there's a scene where they are discussing their plans to attack the neighbouring city and we get to see a shot of all the good guys in the room. I thought to myself, there are too many good guys here, at least one of them is going to be a traitor. Lo and behold! So the story is kept safe, and I don't blame them. I want to say that it's an "A to B" plot, but with time reversing in the movie, does it make it an "A to A" plot? Regardless, this is a summer blockbuster action movie, it doesn't have to be plotcentric, so I don't blame them for this.

The only real problem I had was with the actual sacred dagger itself used as a plot device. Because the dagger has the ability to reverse time, it takes away a lot of the tension and emotions that can arise during the movie. Anytime anything major happened in the plot, you knew that it could be reversed with the use of the dagger. It does take away some of the investment you have in the characters.

Still, the movie is stunning to watch. The wide shots of Persia (or Morocco where it was filmed) are beautiful and breathtaking. The action is fun to watch, be it the sword fighting, or watching Dastan parkour across the city.

What made it a fun movie to watch was the pacing, and I have to thank Mike Newell for that. Even at two hours, the movie never feels tired and the action scenes are placed well between talking scenes. For an action movie, this worked.

Jake Gyllenhaal and Gemma Arterton worked well together and much like the Prince of Persia game from two years ago, I enjoyed the banter that the two had together when they were both onscreen, always taking shots at each other. I thought their chemistry worked well. It also helped that Arterton is the definition of beauty. So the acting was top notch across the board, but I mean, that's expected with heavyweights like Ben Kingsley and Alfred Molina (who steals the show) onboard. As I was watching it, my geek meter went off the charts. I realized that this was a reunion of sorts between Kingsley and Molina, who about 15 years ago were in the movie Species together. Holy geekgasms!

It's kind of disappointing that it's underperforming at the box office as it's fun for the whole family. As a final word, I'll say this. As per normal movie standards, I'd say that the movie was good, but as per video-game-to-movie standards, it should be considered great. Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE ARTIST!!!!!!!

The Artist is director Michael Hazanavicius ode to the silent films of yesteryear. Not only focus on a silent movie actor and movie making, but it in itself is also a silent movie. The movie follows a silent movie actor named George Valentin through the rise and fall of his career. At the start of the film, we see George as this superstar celebrity; he loves the glitz and glamour of being a famous actor and soaks in all the attention he can get. He loves having his photos taken and being adorned on the front pages of newspapers. He is THAT kind of celebrity. At the premiere event of his latest movie, he bumps into one Peppy Miller – a young woman with big ambitions and dreams in Hollywoodland. The lives of the two intersect and an attraction immediately blossoms. The romance could only go so far as Valentin is a (happily?) married man. George’s superstardom reaches its height at a precarious time. And as the 1920s are ushered out, so are silent movies. The new decade brings w...

Finally, the Xbox 360!!

So as I mentioned in a previous post, I received an Xbox 360 for Christmas from my dad. A great present it was! I've had 3 weeks to enjoy it so I guess I can give you my impressions of it now. First the controller. In truth, I haven't felt a controller this comfortable in my gaming life before. As a child who grew up on the 8-bit generation, with just a directional pad and 2 buttons, there was quite a learning curve getting used to using two analog sticks at the same time. You might say, "Hey Lam, how bout the PS2? You have that machine, and that has analog sticks". True, but of the twenty or so games I have for that, all of them used either only 1 analog stick, or allowed the option to switch on to the directional pad. Using 2 sticks at the same time was at first just uncomfortable. This made for all sorts of trouble as I was playing Gears of War . Luckily for me, I had computer controlled teammates that watched my back. I love the Media Center capabilities...

DTV Madness: Jack Brooks - M.S. and Gingerdead Man 2

Okay, honestly, I think this will be the last DTV post for a while. One man can only take so much shit. I'm only human, I have feelings too. These two movies pushed my limit. I'm going to be in DTV-detox for the next month or so. Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer I thought that with a title like this, it couldn't fail. I thought that with a poster like they had, it couldn't fail. Then I realized something... I failed. I failed in thinking that this movie had any hope. I was expecting some fun horror, mixed with comedy in sort of a Buffy the Vampire Slayer kind of fashion with a bumbling hero and smart quips. I mean, with a title like Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer , was I wrong in expecting a variety of monsters get slayed as the title suggests? It didn't help much that the monsters looked uber cheesy. They looked like something right out of a Power Rangers episode. But to their credit, at least they stuck with practical make-up and effects rather than CG. The mo...