Skip to main content

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is the first huge budget video-game-to-movie adaptation in a while. But with failure after failure in other franchises, will Prince of Persia be the movie that finally brings success to the genre or will it be another dud?

Prince of Persia tells the story of a young prince named Dastan, who when a child, was nothing but a lowly thief scouring the streets of Persia. After a chance meeting with the king where he witnessed Dastan's courage, he was led to adopt him into his royal family. Dastan, now older, fights alongside his brothers, protecting the land of Persia from their neighbouring enemies. On one particular battle, Dastan comes across a sacred dagger, a treasure to their enemies, with the power to reverse time. During a celebration after the battle victory, an act of treason occurs within the royal family and Dastan finds himself in the middle of a ploy orchestrated by someone close to him. Along with Princess Tamina, from the neighbouring nation, Dastan seeks to uncover the truth behind the crime perpetrated against his family.

The rights were picked up by Disney a few years ago with hopes that they could turn this video game franchise into one of their summer tentpoles similarly to Pirates of the Caribbean.

Plotwise, it was a by-the-numbers kind of a story. You knew where things were headed at almost all times. This made it sort of funny to watch. In the beginning of the movie, there's a scene where they are discussing their plans to attack the neighbouring city and we get to see a shot of all the good guys in the room. I thought to myself, there are too many good guys here, at least one of them is going to be a traitor. Lo and behold! So the story is kept safe, and I don't blame them. I want to say that it's an "A to B" plot, but with time reversing in the movie, does it make it an "A to A" plot? Regardless, this is a summer blockbuster action movie, it doesn't have to be plotcentric, so I don't blame them for this.

The only real problem I had was with the actual sacred dagger itself used as a plot device. Because the dagger has the ability to reverse time, it takes away a lot of the tension and emotions that can arise during the movie. Anytime anything major happened in the plot, you knew that it could be reversed with the use of the dagger. It does take away some of the investment you have in the characters.

Still, the movie is stunning to watch. The wide shots of Persia (or Morocco where it was filmed) are beautiful and breathtaking. The action is fun to watch, be it the sword fighting, or watching Dastan parkour across the city.

What made it a fun movie to watch was the pacing, and I have to thank Mike Newell for that. Even at two hours, the movie never feels tired and the action scenes are placed well between talking scenes. For an action movie, this worked.

Jake Gyllenhaal and Gemma Arterton worked well together and much like the Prince of Persia game from two years ago, I enjoyed the banter that the two had together when they were both onscreen, always taking shots at each other. I thought their chemistry worked well. It also helped that Arterton is the definition of beauty. So the acting was top notch across the board, but I mean, that's expected with heavyweights like Ben Kingsley and Alfred Molina (who steals the show) onboard. As I was watching it, my geek meter went off the charts. I realized that this was a reunion of sorts between Kingsley and Molina, who about 15 years ago were in the movie Species together. Holy geekgasms!

It's kind of disappointing that it's underperforming at the box office as it's fun for the whole family. As a final word, I'll say this. As per normal movie standards, I'd say that the movie was good, but as per video-game-to-movie standards, it should be considered great. Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens!!!!!!!!!!

(Warning: Spoilers Ahead)
Star Wars!!!!  After a 10 year gap we finally receive a new entry into the now Disney owned Star Wars franchise!  So it is apt that the new entry is called the Force Awakens.
The movie starts off 30 years from where the Return of the Jedi last left us.  The Empire has fallen and the Rebels have seemingly disbanded.  But from the ashes of the past, a new threat has risen.  Out of the fallen Empire, a new army called the First Order has spawned, threatening to finish off what the Empire set out to do –  eliminate the force by terminating the last known Jedi, Luke Skywalker.  But as the Empire has evolved so have the Rebels.  Led by General Leia Organa, the Resistance (or the new Rebels) aims to find Luke first, to stop the First Order.
We are told this story through two new main characters.  Rey, who is a scavenger on the planet Jakku, who harvests scrap metals to earn a meal.  Finn, a turncoat stormtrooper who realizes his purpose could be something more than j…

R.I.P. Evan Tanner

The body of the professional fighter and former UFC champion, Evan Tanner, 37, was found in the Palo Verde mountain area of California on September 8th, 2008. He was found a few miles away from his campsite on foot, with no water, where the temperatures were around 110 degrees fahrenheit. The coroner's report listed the cause of death as from heat exposure.

Tanner left Oceanside, California on September 2nd. On September 4th, he sent a text message to a friend telling him that his motorcycle was out of gas, that he was out of water, and if his friend didn't hear from him the next day, to call the authorities. Unfortunately, Evan never returned home.

I'm not the hugest MMA fan, I consider myself a casual fan, and a n00b at best. I was listening to Dave Meltzer and Bryan Alvarez of the Wrestling Observer Radio, and the story of Tanner's life sounded intriguing.

As fantastic as it sounds, Tanner ventured into the deserts in search of treasure and adventure. I kid you …

That's just RELIGULOUS!

I won tickets to an early screening of Religulous and took my brother to watch it earlier tonight. The film was directed by Larry Charles (of Seinfeld, Curb Your Enthusiasm, and Borat fame), but clearly this was the Bill Maher show.

The movie follows Maher as he treks around the world trying to find out why people believe what they do. He is basically questioning them as to why they are so certain, as he himself tries to promote doub.t The movie primarily focuses on western religions, but in the latter half he tries to do a lightning round with other faiths (ie. Scientology, Mormonism, Islam, etc).

He interviews a bevy of loony characters to ensure laughs, and oftentimes with a smug and arrogant flair. In that sense, the movie works as it balances with more serious talks as he learns about other religions. But more often than not, the discussions are with wacky people rather than learned professionals.

One of the high points for me was a scene in a London park where he pretended to …