Skip to main content

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is the first huge budget video-game-to-movie adaptation in a while. But with failure after failure in other franchises, will Prince of Persia be the movie that finally brings success to the genre or will it be another dud?

Prince of Persia tells the story of a young prince named Dastan, who when a child, was nothing but a lowly thief scouring the streets of Persia. After a chance meeting with the king where he witnessed Dastan's courage, he was led to adopt him into his royal family. Dastan, now older, fights alongside his brothers, protecting the land of Persia from their neighbouring enemies. On one particular battle, Dastan comes across a sacred dagger, a treasure to their enemies, with the power to reverse time. During a celebration after the battle victory, an act of treason occurs within the royal family and Dastan finds himself in the middle of a ploy orchestrated by someone close to him. Along with Princess Tamina, from the neighbouring nation, Dastan seeks to uncover the truth behind the crime perpetrated against his family.

The rights were picked up by Disney a few years ago with hopes that they could turn this video game franchise into one of their summer tentpoles similarly to Pirates of the Caribbean.

Plotwise, it was a by-the-numbers kind of a story. You knew where things were headed at almost all times. This made it sort of funny to watch. In the beginning of the movie, there's a scene where they are discussing their plans to attack the neighbouring city and we get to see a shot of all the good guys in the room. I thought to myself, there are too many good guys here, at least one of them is going to be a traitor. Lo and behold! So the story is kept safe, and I don't blame them. I want to say that it's an "A to B" plot, but with time reversing in the movie, does it make it an "A to A" plot? Regardless, this is a summer blockbuster action movie, it doesn't have to be plotcentric, so I don't blame them for this.

The only real problem I had was with the actual sacred dagger itself used as a plot device. Because the dagger has the ability to reverse time, it takes away a lot of the tension and emotions that can arise during the movie. Anytime anything major happened in the plot, you knew that it could be reversed with the use of the dagger. It does take away some of the investment you have in the characters.

Still, the movie is stunning to watch. The wide shots of Persia (or Morocco where it was filmed) are beautiful and breathtaking. The action is fun to watch, be it the sword fighting, or watching Dastan parkour across the city.

What made it a fun movie to watch was the pacing, and I have to thank Mike Newell for that. Even at two hours, the movie never feels tired and the action scenes are placed well between talking scenes. For an action movie, this worked.

Jake Gyllenhaal and Gemma Arterton worked well together and much like the Prince of Persia game from two years ago, I enjoyed the banter that the two had together when they were both onscreen, always taking shots at each other. I thought their chemistry worked well. It also helped that Arterton is the definition of beauty. So the acting was top notch across the board, but I mean, that's expected with heavyweights like Ben Kingsley and Alfred Molina (who steals the show) onboard. As I was watching it, my geek meter went off the charts. I realized that this was a reunion of sorts between Kingsley and Molina, who about 15 years ago were in the movie Species together. Holy geekgasms!

It's kind of disappointing that it's underperforming at the box office as it's fun for the whole family. As a final word, I'll say this. As per normal movie standards, I'd say that the movie was good, but as per video-game-to-movie standards, it should be considered great. Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Waid's IRREDEEMABLE (Issues #1-7)

(Note: be warned that this review is on the spoiler heavy side, so read at your own discretion if you don't want the story spoiled.) Since I was a teenager, I always had this dream that I would become a quirky movie director and I'd make a bunch of crappy little horror movies to start with, but that my first big movie would be this anti-superhero movie. I dreamed up of an Apocalypse Now -like movie using existing Marvel superheroes where Captain America would go mad, slaughtering the innocent and go into hiding somewhere 'up the river'. There would be a detective like character (possibly superhero) that would be after him, interviewing his former teammates to find out what made the all-American hero go mad. Imagine my surprise when I started reading Irredeemable . Although not exactly the story in my dreams, it's pretty close. I started reading the series this past weekend upon the glowing review that those geeks over at iFanboy put up a few weeks ago. As far a

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3!!!!!!!!!!!! (PS4)

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 is Activision’s latest entry into the bestselling Call of Duty franchise.  Developed by Treyarch Studios, the Black Ops subseries of Call of Duty games has been considered by many as the best of the COD games.  Whereas Black Ops 1 and 2 were direct sequels, BO3 seems only to be a spiritual sequel to its predecessors.  There is no direct or clear continuation of story from the previous entries.  Rather it takes the ideas of mind control and manipulation, and spins off its own story. It’s a futuristic world, where humans are infused with technology (much like Robocop!) and fight alongside and against robots.  This time around, you assume the role of an unnamed soldier, who together with your partner Hendricks and a CIA agent named Rachel Kane, track down a former Black Ops commander named John Taylor as he and his former squad appears to have gone rogue destroying CIA sites around the world.  The story will take you to Singapore, Egypt and ev

The League of Denial (2013)

The topic of concussions in sports is a dialogue that’s been growing the past number of years.  Do a search on ‘concussions’ and ‘football’ and you’ll get several thousand hits on the controversy that’s surrounded the sport.  It’s a challenging topic as the research is all relatively new, and the topic itself challenges the mentality and philosophy adopted by football loving Americans.  Now, I’m not a fan of football or NFL but when I saw this book lying at the local bookstore, my interest was piqued.  Although I’m not a fan of football, those that know me know that I’m an unabashed fan of prowrestling.  Talks about concussions are also quite a hot topic even within the prowrestling sub-culture.  Earlier this year, one of the hottest wrestlers of the current era, Daniel Bryan, retired early at the age of 34 due to a history of concussion related issues.  Interestingly, he was not permitted to return to the ring due to the disapproval by WWE’s medical director – a doctor by the name