Skip to main content

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo [Foreign]

I don't get it.

The movie is based on the book of the same name written by the late Swedish author Stieg Larsson. It's part of a trilogy of novels that has sold over 23 million copies worldwide. Everytime I walk into a Chapters or an Indigo, it's always on the bestsellers shelf/rack. So two weeks ago I sat at the bookstore for about an hour and started reading it. I got to around page 40 or so but the book never captivated me. It's just a straight up thriller/mystery story, what's the sell? I just don't get it.

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo is a Swedish produced thriller that follows an unlikely pairing of characters. The first is Mikael Blomkvist, a middle-aged journalist stuck in the middle of a controversy between his magazine company and a rich industrialist. He is hired by a rich old businessman named Henrik Vanger to solve a missing persons case, that of his beloved niece who has disappeared for 40 years. In exchange for his work, Vanger offers Blomkvist financial backing for the fledgling magazine company and evidence to prove his innocence amidst the controversy. He is aided by Lisbeth Salander, a young bisexual, cyberpunk girl. Together they work to unravel the mystery behind Vanger's niece and the Vanger dynasty.

In the end, the movie was alright, but certainly nothing to write home about. I enjoy thrillers as much as the next person but it just seemed to me that there was nothing that warranted all the acclaim that the book/movie was receiving. I think I had the same problem with this as I did with The Davinci Code movie. The stories are completely different but both are still highly acclaimed books. Yet with both movies, I just felt too much exposition; too much telling us what's happened instead of showing us what's happened. I think it works well in a book format as the whole adventure is created in our imaginations but I just don't think that style works with movies which are trying to show us the adventure.

That said, the movie was beautifully shot and produced. I think I enjoy foreign movies because it is a complete escape, from locale to language to culture. This is only the second Swedish movie I've ever seen (with the first being Let the Right One In) and I'm still impressed with their quality of production.

It's still in select theaters right now, so if you enjoyed the books, I suppose you couldn't go wrong with the movie. Otherwise, that's it for this week. Until next time, later geeks!

Comments

Slapinions said…
Whoa. Weird coincidence here: I'm nearing the end of the book and got a little spooked, so I decided to put it down and hit the web.

I thought the book started horribly slow and was quite tedious. In many respects it reminded me of a self-indulgent novel I wrote and abandoned about five years ago. The author of 'Tattoo' wrote these in his spare time for fun, and I think they would have been leaner and more captivating if he'd written w/ an audience in mind.

So for 200 pages I was bored - I told someone it was like watching paste dry - but committed. Then slowly, slowly, slowly, I actually started to *care* about the mystery. I think it is largely due to the sheer weight of all the background you're given on the characters; you're forced to care by default.

Now, 100 pages from the end I can admit to being legitimately spooked at the idea of heading to the dark basement to retrieve a load of laundry.

So, 1st half of the book: C-/D
2nd half: A -
Total: good enough to pick up the 2nd book
The Lam said…
Hey Dan,

Thanks for the input, I appreciate hearing from someone who's read/reading the book.

So is the book or series worth the phenomenon that the media is making it out to be? Because the movie didn't make it seem that way, and since from what you say of a C-/D first half for the 1st half of the book, doesn't make it sound worthy of all the acclaim.
Slapinions said…
1st, apologies for my spelling in this comment. I'ts late.

Honestly, while I wound up liking the book, all the hoopla and praise seems surreal. Stylistically it's clumbsy, the pace is slow, and (having now finished it) the book continues on for more than 50 pages AFTER the mystery is concluded!

I disliked Da Vinci, but I could see why others would enjoy it. I'm not sure why this wasn't left on the shelves gathering dust.

I don't know. All those points against it and I'm still going to borrow the next book from the library. So who knows - maybe the author made a pact with the devil to win fans. It worked for Stephanie Myers :)

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW HAIKUS!!!! (#3)

It's time for another edition of Review Haikus; a feature I like to write when I'm too lazy to write out full reviews~!!! The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 Tony Scott schlockfest~! All his movies seem the same. A needless remake. Denzel's a bad-ass. Given up on Travolta. 1 of 2 ain't bad. Public Enemies Well? Disappointed. I expected more from Mann. The pacing felt off. Acting was good though. Man-crush on Depp and Bale. 5 more syllables! Saw VI Yes, another Saw. Harder to tell them apart. Blood, guts, bad story. Why more Saw movies? Each movie makes less and less. End this series now. ====== Later geeks!

Sam Raimi's Dragging Someone To Hell!!!

It's great to see Sam Raimi back in his form with his latest entry Drag Me To Hell . Simply glorious, it is a horror geek's dream. This is the Sam we all know and love from Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness , before he got all caught up in the comic book geek universe of Spider-Man . After 10 years (from the first time I watched Evil Dead 2 ), he has remained my favourite film director... although he did try my patience with Spider-Man 3 . I know this euphoria that I'm feeling now will be short lived, as even as I type this review, Raimi is already at work on the pre-production of Spider-Man 4 (yay?). So what is there to say about Drag Me To Hell ? This is the way a summer movie should be, touching on all those senses that make movie going an actual experience. There were thrills, chills, laughs and cheers; the way things should be! Drag Me To Hell tells a story of a young loan officer named Christine, who in an effort to advance her own career, has to turn down a

Lt. Aldo Raine wants his scalps!!!!!!!!!!!!

I missed The Inglorious Basterds during its theatrical run and it's a shame too because I'm a fool for Tarantino movies. But I finally got to see it this weekend and I'm happy to say that I mostly enjoyed it. I don't think it's his best movie, but it was damned entertaining. The Inglorious Basterds takes place during World War II and tells its story by following three different groups of characters: from Lt. Aldo Raine and his squad of soldiers infamously known as the Basterds, Col. Hans Landa, a Nazi colonel better known as "The Jew Hunter", and from a young Jewish girl named Shosanna, who had her family murdered by Col. Landa. We follow the Basterds in their Nazi killing business (and business is good) as they lay out a plan to take out several high ranking officials all at once. We follow Shosanna as she operates her theater and lays down her own plans in exacting revenge on the Nazis. And of course, the "Jew Hunter" is hot on their trai