Skip to main content

Humbled by kindness

It has been quite an eye opening few weeks lately, in a positive way though. It's been amazing the way kindness has been shown to me in my life. In some ways its by new friends, in other ways by close friends and in more surprising ways, by people I don't even know. It's been a humbling experience and sometimes I have to take a step back and say "wow". I've been shown so much that sometimes it becomes confusing; why am I receiving all this kindness? I don't truly understand it but I know that God is gracious, that is certain.

I was looking through the Bible earlier to find some good words on kindness and I came across this in 2 Peter 1:5-6 where it talks about how we should live our lives based on everything that God has blessed us with. Specifically it reads: "For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, love." In this verse, there's a chain of different behaviours, where one leads to another with the final result being love. We as Christians are called to have love, to show love and to be love. And according to that verse, one of the key connections to get to that love is the concept of kindness.

I know that I have to show this more in my own life. In general, I'd like to think that I'm a jovial, laid-back, and joyous guy (I wonder if I come across this way though?). You'll often find me smiling and laughing more than I am sulking or balking. Back in the day, I was the happy breed of emo kid! But at the same time, I know I can be a quiet and shy person, which can really hurt my attempts to show kindness. And so if I'm not showing kindness, how can I truly say that I'm being loving? This past month, I've been keeping this in mind more and letting down my own guard to show kindness and warmness. It's still a work in progress but already I'm seeing the results, not only in myself, but with the people surrounding me.

Last week I was with a few friends on a late Tuesday night at Starbucks talking about our faith and how we are as followers of Christ. What stood out to me in our conversation was this idea of a dichotomy in the human behaviour stemming from the choices we make. For example, if you're angry for whatever reason, you can choose to exert that anger on others, ruining their day and making them angry. They in turn can take out their anger on someone else and so forth, creating a domino-like effect of fire and brimstone. However, on the flipside, we can choose to be kind and share joy with others, thereby, making others feel good allowing them to reciprocate that same feeling unto others; creating a domino-like effect of kindness.

The ideas are similar but on the complete opposite ends of the spectrum. What we do and the way we choose to act can be infectious. But it comes down to how you choose to react. Do you choose to be a positive infection or a negative infection? Who would have thought that an infection could be a good thing!

I should also note that at the end of that night at Starbucks, one of the employees there handed me and my friends each a voucher to get a free drink at anytime at Starbucks. No rhyme or reason, we didn't know him. Kindness in action. Amazing.

I'm not a man that believes in coincidence or chance, so really, it's only fitting that this coming Sunday, Pastor Cyril will be preaching the fifth message in a series about the fruits of the Spirit; namely, kindness. Crazy huh? Life comes full circle. So if you wanna hear more about kindness, FreeChurch, February 21 at 5pm.

And to end off, I leave you with a silly picture. Later geeks.

Comments

Unknown said…
The positive infection is the way to go. Otherwise, life is tough to endure.

Popular posts from this blog

A Lion's Tale: Around the World in Spandex

As part of my "campaign of cheapness", the past 3 months I've been going to the Indigo bookstore downtown about twice a week to read Chris Jericho's autobiography A Lion's Tale: Around the World in Spandex . I'd park down for about 1.5 to 2 hours per visit and it took 3 months to do, but I finally finished it. Let it be known, that Jericho was my favourite wrestler from 1997 to 2002 (it only lasted this long because from 2002-07, I stopped watching/following wrestling completely). I learned of him during my junior high school years when me and my friends would watch WWF and WCW programming religiously. I knew there was something that stood out in Chris, it might have been his style of fighting, his comedic arrogance on the mic or his boyish good looks. Well whatever it was, I believed in him. My friends at the time were skeptical, but I would argue with them why he was so great. It was during his cruiserweight feud with Dean Malenko that really brought ou...

The League of Denial (2013)

The topic of concussions in sports is a dialogue that’s been growing the past number of years.  Do a search on ‘concussions’ and ‘football’ and you’ll get several thousand hits on the controversy that’s surrounded the sport.  It’s a challenging topic as the research is all relatively new, and the topic itself challenges the mentality and philosophy adopted by football loving Americans.  Now, I’m not a fan of football or NFL but when I saw this book lying at the local bookstore, my interest was piqued.  Although I’m not a fan of football, those that know me know that I’m an unabashed fan of prowrestling.  Talks about concussions are also quite a hot topic even within the prowrestling sub-culture.  Earlier this year, one of the hottest wrestlers of the current era, Daniel Bryan, retired early at the age of 34 due to a history of concussion related issues.  Interestingly, he was not permitted to return to the ring due to the disapproval by WWE’s medic...

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is ba...