Skip to main content

Intergalactic AVATAR, AVATAR Intergalactic!!

Phenomenal.

In short:

Starcraft within Warcraft + playing World of Warcraft + Aliens (the James Cameron one) + An Inconvenient Truth + the BBC Planet Earth series = Avatar.

That ain't a bad thing at all.

I'm going to skip talking about the story because basically that's the way I went into the movie (knowing pretty much nothing) and I recommend the same thing for you if you haven't seen it yet. I pretty much avoided all the reviews on AICN, but I did skim over Roger Ebert's who gave it an resounding thumbs up.

I will say this though, while the storyline doesn't really reinvent the wheel, it still makes for a pretty damn nice looking wheel. While not completely original, the story is quite layered and allegorical, and I'm sure there's many different aspects that can be singled out that could be related to past, present or possibly future social conflicts.

I saw the movie on IMAX 3D and the word 'beautiful' doesn't begin to describe how the whole thing looked. It's interesting because as the movie started in the space station and battle station, I thought to myself, "wow, that is pretty cool, but not mind blowing". It's not until 15 minutes later when the crew lands in the jungles of Pandora that my jaw just dropped. It is gorgeous! The world of Pandora is lush, seamless and teeming with life. All the bright colours of the different vegetation in the green backdrop was absolutely stunning in 3D. Anytime the movie switched back into battle station scenes I got antsy for the movie to switch back to the Pandora scenes. I seriously would not mind watching an hour of the Na'vis running around the forests in 3D if only just to see more of their world.

All the actors who played the Na'vis and all the computer geeks that rendered them into life have to be given much of the credit for its success. I don't think the movie would of had such a strong emotional connection if we couldn't believe that the Na'vis were real and so the geeks and their computer powers really brought them to reality. Digital characters have never seemed so good.

It might sound a bit silly, but my favourite character in the movie was the main bad guy, Colonel Miles Quaritch. Of all the characters in the movie, his was probably the most one-dimensional, yet I loved it. He's the stereotypical, macho, bad-ass Colonel character that you've seen in movies before, but I just thought that Stephen Lang (who played him) did a great job of making us hate him (note: I guess it's like in wrestling, I like the bad guys usually more than the good guys). Anyhow, I both laughed and was in awe of his macho-ness in that he'd rather shoot shit down than worry about putting on his oxygen mask or chasing people down rather than worry that his shoulder is on fire. I don't know this for a fact, but I bet if there were cut scenes, we'd see that he bleeds bullets and pisses gasoline. That's how tough he is.

I'm glad James Cameron is back to his geek roots after a 10 year lull with Titanic and documentaries. I can't wait for Battle Angel!

Anyhow, I gotta give special cred to my friend Jeezy for treating me out for this matinee screening. The bromance is strong, LOL. We all loved the movie, so it was good times.

This movie gets a resounding thumbs up and I recommend seeing it in IMAX 3D if it's available in your city. Just make sure you get to the theater at least an hour beforehand to snag good seats. The line-ups were ridick today at the theater we went to.

Fare thee well geeks!



Comments

Beka said…
Great job reviewing it Jeff!
I'm going to Pandora for my honeymoon I decided :) It's just too freakin' awesome and beautiful not to.
j-yeezy said…
Thanks for the shout-out Lam! I agree it was a great movie!
The Lam said…
No prob, you got the commenting working now, nice!
grace said…
i wasn't really interested in seeing this, but all of you guys had really positive feedback. that's a solid review for avatar!
Anonymous said…
lol glad to hear you liked it and managed to get into one of the shows. Avatar IMAX is on it's 6th day of being 100% sold out today huah~!

Popular posts from this blog

Dreamers, Achievers, Believers

It was quite a week last week. It started off on a more heavy note last Sunday, but as the week wore on, things became better and more clear. So let's do a little recap. This is going to be kind of long, so if you find this kind of stuff boring I've inserted pictures of funny cats for your entertainment. So... 1.5 Weeks Ago About 1.5 weeks ago, my friend Jon from Living Room gave me the contact info for his uncle. His uncle is an engineer and apparently was looking for new grads and new hands to hire. That week, I gave him a few calls but he wasn't there when I called him and when he returned my calls, I wasn't here either. We were playing phone tag that week *insert schoolgirl giggle*. Sunday Morning So last Sunday morning, his uncle gave me a call at 9 am (The morning! My weakness! HISS!) and we talked about stuff. I was telling him a bit about school as well as elaborating my work/coop experience as he didn't have my resume yet. So he goes on to tell

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here ). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have. In The Science of God , Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible. The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will. In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genes

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is