Skip to main content

Review Roundup: Dragonball Evolution, Fast & Furious, Push

Dragonball Evolution

There are just some properties that shouldn't be made into movies. Case in point, Dragonball Evolution.

You need only look at the source material to know that it's gonna be a bad idea to convert it into a movie. The Dragonball canon is so rich and full of depth, that an oversimplified and watered down version would just not work. And not to mention we have a bunch of caucasian actors playing what seemingly are asian-ish (I think at least) characters... way to go Fox!

The action was horrible, the dialogue was heinous, and the acting was a joke. A disaster. Everyone's acting was over-the-top and cartoony... for their sake, I hope it was purposely done that way.

The only credit I can give this movie is that I didn't fall asleep through it... sometimes I surprise myself.

And why was it called Evolution anyways? The only thing that evolved was my boredom.


Fast & Furious

"New Model, Original Parts."

That was the tagline used to promote the latest installment in the Fast & Furious series. This time around, they've gathered up and dusted off the cast from the original movie (seriously, what good have either 4 done in the past few years?).

I enjoyed this movie more than I had any right to. I wanted a high action, low-thinking, adrenaline filled cinematic, and I received it. No, I did not go in with any real expectations. Knowing that the movie only scored 28% on Rotten Tomatoes, I knew I could not expect much. Yet after watching the movie, I can't help but disagree with at least those 22% of reviews... it deserved 50% I think.

I mean, this is a F&F movie; you can't go in expecting an intricate plot or Oscar-worthy performances. It's lowbrow entertainment, and it succeeds at that level. For an hour and a half, I turned my brain off, and was thoroughly entertained.


Push

When Push originally came out this past winter, I dismissed it as this year's Jumper (a huge dud from last year's winter).

In a way, this movie is features the X-Men's mutants, except that they don't call themselves mutants. Depending on what type of power they had, they each had their own gimmicky sort of class names, ie. sniffers, watchers, movers, and so forth (someone actually compiled a list on Wikipedia).

In short, this movie is about a bunch of "mutants" chasing after a briefcase. The briefcase contains some sort of serum that's supposed to enhance the mutants, but could be lethal as well. Well, whatever the case, it's not really that important, it's all just a MacGuffin.

The film was helmed by Paul McGuigan who did Lucky Number Slevin and Wicker Park, both of which I enjoyed, so it wasn't much of a surprise that I enjoyed this (even if marginally). HOWEVER, of these three, this one would be the least liked. If I had to give it a number, it'd be 6 out 10.

I couldn't really care for the plot and the acting was passable, but what I enjoyed was the gritty visual style and shaky-cam filming. It's almost like watching a Bourne-movie about people with powers. Combined with filming in Hong Kong, with its bright lights and neon backgrounds, the style works great and helps to really give it a visceral edge.

Plotwise, the final act of the movie suffers due to the convoluted plot that our heroes scheme together.

Oh yah and I don't like Dakota Fanning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

R.I.P. Evan Tanner

The body of the professional fighter and former UFC champion, Evan Tanner, 37, was found in the Palo Verde mountain area of California on September 8th, 2008. He was found a few miles away from his campsite on foot, with no water, where the temperatures were around 110 degrees fahrenheit. The coroner's report listed the cause of death as from heat exposure.

Tanner left Oceanside, California on September 2nd. On September 4th, he sent a text message to a friend telling him that his motorcycle was out of gas, that he was out of water, and if his friend didn't hear from him the next day, to call the authorities. Unfortunately, Evan never returned home.

I'm not the hugest MMA fan, I consider myself a casual fan, and a n00b at best. I was listening to Dave Meltzer and Bryan Alvarez of the Wrestling Observer Radio, and the story of Tanner's life sounded intriguing.

As fantastic as it sounds, Tanner ventured into the deserts in search of treasure and adventure. I kid you …

DTV Madness: Jack Brooks - M.S. and Gingerdead Man 2

Okay, honestly, I think this will be the last DTV post for a while. One man can only take so much shit. I'm only human, I have feelings too. These two movies pushed my limit. I'm going to be in DTV-detox for the next month or so.

Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer

I thought that with a title like this, it couldn't fail. I thought that with a poster like they had, it couldn't fail. Then I realized something... I failed. I failed in thinking that this movie had any hope.

I was expecting some fun horror, mixed with comedy in sort of a Buffy the Vampire Slayer kind of fashion with a bumbling hero and smart quips. I mean, with a title like Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer, was I wrong in expecting a variety of monsters get slayed as the title suggests?

It didn't help much that the monsters looked uber cheesy. They looked like something right out of a Power Rangers episode. But to their credit, at least they stuck with practical make-up and effects rather than CG.

The movie its…

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have.

In The Science of God, Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible.

The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will.

In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genesis. Duri…