Skip to main content

Review Roundup: Dragonball Evolution, Fast & Furious, Push

Dragonball Evolution

There are just some properties that shouldn't be made into movies. Case in point, Dragonball Evolution.

You need only look at the source material to know that it's gonna be a bad idea to convert it into a movie. The Dragonball canon is so rich and full of depth, that an oversimplified and watered down version would just not work. And not to mention we have a bunch of caucasian actors playing what seemingly are asian-ish (I think at least) characters... way to go Fox!

The action was horrible, the dialogue was heinous, and the acting was a joke. A disaster. Everyone's acting was over-the-top and cartoony... for their sake, I hope it was purposely done that way.

The only credit I can give this movie is that I didn't fall asleep through it... sometimes I surprise myself.

And why was it called Evolution anyways? The only thing that evolved was my boredom.


Fast & Furious

"New Model, Original Parts."

That was the tagline used to promote the latest installment in the Fast & Furious series. This time around, they've gathered up and dusted off the cast from the original movie (seriously, what good have either 4 done in the past few years?).

I enjoyed this movie more than I had any right to. I wanted a high action, low-thinking, adrenaline filled cinematic, and I received it. No, I did not go in with any real expectations. Knowing that the movie only scored 28% on Rotten Tomatoes, I knew I could not expect much. Yet after watching the movie, I can't help but disagree with at least those 22% of reviews... it deserved 50% I think.

I mean, this is a F&F movie; you can't go in expecting an intricate plot or Oscar-worthy performances. It's lowbrow entertainment, and it succeeds at that level. For an hour and a half, I turned my brain off, and was thoroughly entertained.


Push

When Push originally came out this past winter, I dismissed it as this year's Jumper (a huge dud from last year's winter).

In a way, this movie is features the X-Men's mutants, except that they don't call themselves mutants. Depending on what type of power they had, they each had their own gimmicky sort of class names, ie. sniffers, watchers, movers, and so forth (someone actually compiled a list on Wikipedia).

In short, this movie is about a bunch of "mutants" chasing after a briefcase. The briefcase contains some sort of serum that's supposed to enhance the mutants, but could be lethal as well. Well, whatever the case, it's not really that important, it's all just a MacGuffin.

The film was helmed by Paul McGuigan who did Lucky Number Slevin and Wicker Park, both of which I enjoyed, so it wasn't much of a surprise that I enjoyed this (even if marginally). HOWEVER, of these three, this one would be the least liked. If I had to give it a number, it'd be 6 out 10.

I couldn't really care for the plot and the acting was passable, but what I enjoyed was the gritty visual style and shaky-cam filming. It's almost like watching a Bourne-movie about people with powers. Combined with filming in Hong Kong, with its bright lights and neon backgrounds, the style works great and helps to really give it a visceral edge.

Plotwise, the final act of the movie suffers due to the convoluted plot that our heroes scheme together.

Oh yah and I don't like Dakota Fanning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW HAIKUS!!!! (#3)

It's time for another edition of Review Haikus; a feature I like to write when I'm too lazy to write out full reviews~!!! The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 Tony Scott schlockfest~! All his movies seem the same. A needless remake. Denzel's a bad-ass. Given up on Travolta. 1 of 2 ain't bad. Public Enemies Well? Disappointed. I expected more from Mann. The pacing felt off. Acting was good though. Man-crush on Depp and Bale. 5 more syllables! Saw VI Yes, another Saw. Harder to tell them apart. Blood, guts, bad story. Why more Saw movies? Each movie makes less and less. End this series now. ====== Later geeks!

Sam Raimi's Dragging Someone To Hell!!!

It's great to see Sam Raimi back in his form with his latest entry Drag Me To Hell . Simply glorious, it is a horror geek's dream. This is the Sam we all know and love from Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness , before he got all caught up in the comic book geek universe of Spider-Man . After 10 years (from the first time I watched Evil Dead 2 ), he has remained my favourite film director... although he did try my patience with Spider-Man 3 . I know this euphoria that I'm feeling now will be short lived, as even as I type this review, Raimi is already at work on the pre-production of Spider-Man 4 (yay?). So what is there to say about Drag Me To Hell ? This is the way a summer movie should be, touching on all those senses that make movie going an actual experience. There were thrills, chills, laughs and cheers; the way things should be! Drag Me To Hell tells a story of a young loan officer named Christine, who in an effort to advance her own career, has to turn down a

Lt. Aldo Raine wants his scalps!!!!!!!!!!!!

I missed The Inglorious Basterds during its theatrical run and it's a shame too because I'm a fool for Tarantino movies. But I finally got to see it this weekend and I'm happy to say that I mostly enjoyed it. I don't think it's his best movie, but it was damned entertaining. The Inglorious Basterds takes place during World War II and tells its story by following three different groups of characters: from Lt. Aldo Raine and his squad of soldiers infamously known as the Basterds, Col. Hans Landa, a Nazi colonel better known as "The Jew Hunter", and from a young Jewish girl named Shosanna, who had her family murdered by Col. Landa. We follow the Basterds in their Nazi killing business (and business is good) as they lay out a plan to take out several high ranking officials all at once. We follow Shosanna as she operates her theater and lays down her own plans in exacting revenge on the Nazis. And of course, the "Jew Hunter" is hot on their trai