Skip to main content

Wrestlemania 25!!!! SNORE!

Wrestlemania has come and gone for the year 2009. It was the 25th anniversary of their biggest PPV, but they certainly did not make it seem like they achieved this milestone. For the most part it was quite the snore-fest this year. I'm not going to go into the "whys", but if you watched the product in the past few months, I'm sure you know why. Anyhow, here are the results with some thoughts (bold highlighting winner):

Money in the Bank - CM Punk: I was screaming with excitement when Punk won. I started a poll on the F4W board~! about a month ago asking people who they think would win. I stated that I think Punk should win because now they can tell the story of how he's the only man to ever win the MITB match 2 years in a row, a feat no one has accomplished. If they were serious about making him a star, then I guess they should give him the belt when he cashes in the briefcase as well. I was listening to the post-Wrestlemania episode of The Law last night, and people sounded pretty unhappy, I think most wanted MVP or Christian to win, and in some cases even Shelton. I think they still have to give MVP a bit of distance from that losing streak skid they gave him, Christian is still too fresh from his return (they fucked up his return in general, even though he's been awesome), and Shelton's just Shelton. Anyhow, this match was really fun, and really exceeded my expectations, especially Kofi Kingston. Lots of high spots and high risk moves, definitely a fun way to start off the show.

Kid Rock Medley: Okay, what the fuck. It's the year 2009. We don't need to see Kid Rock doing a medley. We don't really want to see Kid Rock at all. What a waste of time.

25 Divas Battle Royal - Santina: It was a bad match. It's what you expected. I couldn't tell who was who. Just a buncha generic women in a ring throwing each other out.

Chris Jericho vs. Ricky Steamboat & Roddy Piper & Jimmy Snuka (w/ Ric Flair and Mickey Rourke): It was a bad match due to Piper and Snuka, who shouldn't really be in the ring working tonight. Steamboat clearly saved this match and it was really exciting seeing him go toe to toe against Jericho. His high crossbodies and armdrags had the crowd going nuts. The thing that made this match bad is that it wreaked of TNAism. I mean, Jericho the heel was put into a babyface position having the supposed odds against him being in a 3 vs 1 match. Not only that, but what does it accomplish? He can beat 3 old men? Wow. And what if he had lost? Then he would had his ass kicked by 3 old men. No one goes over in this scenario. TNAism.

Matt Hardy vs. Jeff Hardy Extreme rules match: I can't comment on this match because I fell asleep.

JBL vs. Rey Misterio: And I woke up to this. It was "19 seconds" so there wasn't much to it. JBL retired. Rey Misterio was in some sort of strange Joker costume.

Shawn Michaels vs. Undertaker: Match of the night! Clearly the only reason to order this PPV. It was great. Lots of counters, lots of near falls, and a few scary spots to boot. These two vets worked their asses off and the crowd drunk it all in. This is definitely a match of the year candidate. Just like everyone else says, this should have been the main event of the evening.

Edge vs. John Cena vs. Big Show: The match wasn't as bad as I suspected. It was just good. It was certainly tough to follow Taker/Michaels, but they managed to get a bit of heat, so it worked out a bit. Crowd popped pretty big for Cena, so that helped.

HHH vs. Randy Orton: Horrible.

Overall, the PPV was a thumbs in the middle. If not for the Taker/Michaels and the MITB match this would have been a thumbs down. The whole show sort of reminded me of Gabe Sapolsky's booking style in ROH shows. They'd be really long shows where everyone tries to pull off a main event style match, but in the end, the audience gets too burned out because the show is too long. This show clearly peaked at the Taker/Michaels match, and fell off a cliff afterwards. At least in ROH shows, the matches are still full of dynamic even though the crowds might be drained.

Anyhow, that's it for now. Later marks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW HAIKUS!!!! (#3)

It's time for another edition of Review Haikus; a feature I like to write when I'm too lazy to write out full reviews~!!! The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 Tony Scott schlockfest~! All his movies seem the same. A needless remake. Denzel's a bad-ass. Given up on Travolta. 1 of 2 ain't bad. Public Enemies Well? Disappointed. I expected more from Mann. The pacing felt off. Acting was good though. Man-crush on Depp and Bale. 5 more syllables! Saw VI Yes, another Saw. Harder to tell them apart. Blood, guts, bad story. Why more Saw movies? Each movie makes less and less. End this series now. ====== Later geeks!

Sam Raimi's Dragging Someone To Hell!!!

It's great to see Sam Raimi back in his form with his latest entry Drag Me To Hell . Simply glorious, it is a horror geek's dream. This is the Sam we all know and love from Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness , before he got all caught up in the comic book geek universe of Spider-Man . After 10 years (from the first time I watched Evil Dead 2 ), he has remained my favourite film director... although he did try my patience with Spider-Man 3 . I know this euphoria that I'm feeling now will be short lived, as even as I type this review, Raimi is already at work on the pre-production of Spider-Man 4 (yay?). So what is there to say about Drag Me To Hell ? This is the way a summer movie should be, touching on all those senses that make movie going an actual experience. There were thrills, chills, laughs and cheers; the way things should be! Drag Me To Hell tells a story of a young loan officer named Christine, who in an effort to advance her own career, has to turn down a

Lt. Aldo Raine wants his scalps!!!!!!!!!!!!

I missed The Inglorious Basterds during its theatrical run and it's a shame too because I'm a fool for Tarantino movies. But I finally got to see it this weekend and I'm happy to say that I mostly enjoyed it. I don't think it's his best movie, but it was damned entertaining. The Inglorious Basterds takes place during World War II and tells its story by following three different groups of characters: from Lt. Aldo Raine and his squad of soldiers infamously known as the Basterds, Col. Hans Landa, a Nazi colonel better known as "The Jew Hunter", and from a young Jewish girl named Shosanna, who had her family murdered by Col. Landa. We follow the Basterds in their Nazi killing business (and business is good) as they lay out a plan to take out several high ranking officials all at once. We follow Shosanna as she operates her theater and lays down her own plans in exacting revenge on the Nazis. And of course, the "Jew Hunter" is hot on their trai