Skip to main content

Gail Kim Leaving TNA and Other Thoughts On Women In Wrestlin


On Wednesday, August 20th 2008, it was announced that Gail Kim was leaving TNA and was signing back with WWE. This met fans with confusion as Kim was a prominent player in the TNA Knockout's division. The Knockout's division started not even a year ago and came to fruition with the crowning of Gail Kim as champion after a gauntlet match at Bound for Glory. Clearly the division was centered around Gail Kim as the ultimate babyface and her arch-rival, Awesome Kong as the ultimate heel. It was so classic and it was so simple. The Knockout's division basically grew from around these two, and it was clearly catching the attention of TNA fans.

I've said it before, there are only two reasons to watch TNA: firstly is for the X-Division and secondly, but equally, is for the women's Knockouts Division. TNA claims that they do all those wacky and stip matches in order to distinguish their product from WWE's. But if they take a step back and look at what they have, they are already distinguished, in regards to the X and Knockouts Division... there's no need for stupid angles and stip matches~!!

In particular, with the Knockout's Division, what makes them so special is that they (for the most part) hire women who were initially trained as wrestlers. They may not be tall thin bikini-type models (a la WWE Divas), but clearly they are beautiful... and they can work!!!!! The booking agents for TNA's heavyweight division should really watch what the other agent's are doing for the Knockouts division; their angles make sense and they draw good heat.

WWE uses a reverse approach of hiring bikini models and then converting them into what they call wrestlers (or Divas). With the exception of one or two Divas, the division is a joke; there's a lack of heat in the matches and the crowd can clearly be seen as bored and ready for the next match. They are beautiful women, there's no denying that, but a part of me thinks that people go to wrestling events primarily to see wrestling.

Again, what separates the Knockouts from the Divas is that they create characters which develops into intrigue for the fans. There's all sorts of colourful characters: a beer chugging trailer trash (basically a woman Steve Austin), a punk rock chick, a mysterious gargantuan woman (and her equally mysterious middle eastern female manager), a cowgirl (the pride of Tennesee), and so forth. The characters they play and their mannerisms help them distinguish each other from being just generic women wrestlers. In WWE, it's quite different; they are basically distinguished by the colour of their hair. Case in point, there was a Divas battle royal some months ago, and even the commentators were getting confused with who was who, and who was getting eliminated.

So as shitty as the TNA product can be, they sure know how to handle their women's division. Can you imagine WWE placing a women's match in their main event slot on a Raw or Smackdown? Me neither. TNA is able to not only place a Knockout's match as the main event, but it draws even more viewers than the men's heavyweight main event. The following is data from the Wrestling Observer Newsletter (issues August 11th and 25th of this year):
  • TNA Impact on July 31st drew 1.6 million viewers. The main event was Gail Kim & Taylor Wilde VS The Beautiful People, which drew the largest quarter for the whole show, increasing by 118,000 viewers.
  • TNA Impact on August 14th drew 1.2 million viewers. The main event was an amatuer style match with AJ Styles VS Kurt Angle, which lost 14,000 viewers. So people decided to tune out the main event.
Velvet Sky's shirt says it all, "OMG WTF". There's not much more to say, the proof is in the pudding. TNA, continue with the good work with the women. WWE, open your eyes, open your minds. Later geeks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Waid's IRREDEEMABLE (Issues #1-7)

(Note: be warned that this review is on the spoiler heavy side, so read at your own discretion if you don't want the story spoiled.) Since I was a teenager, I always had this dream that I would become a quirky movie director and I'd make a bunch of crappy little horror movies to start with, but that my first big movie would be this anti-superhero movie. I dreamed up of an Apocalypse Now -like movie using existing Marvel superheroes where Captain America would go mad, slaughtering the innocent and go into hiding somewhere 'up the river'. There would be a detective like character (possibly superhero) that would be after him, interviewing his former teammates to find out what made the all-American hero go mad. Imagine my surprise when I started reading Irredeemable . Although not exactly the story in my dreams, it's pretty close. I started reading the series this past weekend upon the glowing review that those geeks over at iFanboy put up a few weeks ago. As far a

DTV Madness: Jack Brooks - M.S. and Gingerdead Man 2

Okay, honestly, I think this will be the last DTV post for a while. One man can only take so much shit. I'm only human, I have feelings too. These two movies pushed my limit. I'm going to be in DTV-detox for the next month or so. Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer I thought that with a title like this, it couldn't fail. I thought that with a poster like they had, it couldn't fail. Then I realized something... I failed. I failed in thinking that this movie had any hope. I was expecting some fun horror, mixed with comedy in sort of a Buffy the Vampire Slayer kind of fashion with a bumbling hero and smart quips. I mean, with a title like Jack Brooks: Monster Slayer , was I wrong in expecting a variety of monsters get slayed as the title suggests? It didn't help much that the monsters looked uber cheesy. They looked like something right out of a Power Rangers episode. But to their credit, at least they stuck with practical make-up and effects rather than CG. The mo

Finally, the Xbox 360!!

So as I mentioned in a previous post, I received an Xbox 360 for Christmas from my dad. A great present it was! I've had 3 weeks to enjoy it so I guess I can give you my impressions of it now. First the controller. In truth, I haven't felt a controller this comfortable in my gaming life before. As a child who grew up on the 8-bit generation, with just a directional pad and 2 buttons, there was quite a learning curve getting used to using two analog sticks at the same time. You might say, "Hey Lam, how bout the PS2? You have that machine, and that has analog sticks". True, but of the twenty or so games I have for that, all of them used either only 1 analog stick, or allowed the option to switch on to the directional pad. Using 2 sticks at the same time was at first just uncomfortable. This made for all sorts of trouble as I was playing Gears of War . Luckily for me, I had computer controlled teammates that watched my back. I love the Media Center capabilities