Skip to main content

Hanging out with THE STRANGERS

I caught The Strangers the other night, and I can say that I was mostly entertained. The movie felt like a throwback to old school 70's genre movies brought to the 21st century, sometimes channeling elements from John Carpenter's original Halloween, and the more current, Funny Games by Michael Haneke. In fact, with the exception of cell phones, there were no devices to tie the movie down to this century. I mean, they even used a record player to play music. Who does that anymore!?!? It's just fucking creepy! Supposedly, this true story occured in 2005 too. But I digress.

The first half of the movie did well to make us care for the characters as well as building suspense. The plot, for those who are unfamiliar, has a young couple returning to a remote country home late at night after a friend's wedding reception. The couple, played by Scott Speedman and Liv Tyler, are themselves at an emotional state due to a marriage proposal that fell through earlier in the evening. Cue in three mysterious strangers in creepy masks who stalk and harass the couple throughout the night (it should be noted that one of the strangers sports a potatoe-sac-like-mask, perhaps a nod to Jason Vorhees of Friday the 13th Part 2?). The second half was closer to a typical thrill ride, nothing special, but nothing wrong either. Yes, the plot is paper thin, but it's the execution of it that truly delivers.

First time director Bryan Bertino understands how to create a terrifying sense of suspense. He gives the audience glimpses of the strangers lurking in the background, unbeknownst to the couple, rather than the cheap jump-scares offered by a typical-Hollywood horror flick. It's this suspense that is the strong point to this movie. To borrow a quote from Roger Ebert in describing Hitchcock's Rear Window, "A bomb under a table goes off, and that's surprise. We know the bomb is under the table but NOT when it will go off, and that's suspense." Judging by the audience reaction at the theater, it succeeded in instilling terror to its audience.

The audience is made to feel sympathetic for the couple simply because she rejected his marriage proposal, and so establishing their emotional vulnerability. Add to that mix the deranged strangers, and you've got a couple who are at a low point after another low point. The shit hits the proverbial fan, and it couldn't be at a worst time.

The only real beef I had with the movie was the final shot. It just felt like typical-Hollywood bullshit whereas the rest of the movie was a bit more bold in some of its choices.

If you're a fan of cookie-cutter horror and are expecting some cheap thrills, then this movie might not be for you. But if you're looking for a genuine fright experience, then I'd say to give The Strangers a shot.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dreamers, Achievers, Believers

It was quite a week last week. It started off on a more heavy note last Sunday, but as the week wore on, things became better and more clear. So let's do a little recap. This is going to be kind of long, so if you find this kind of stuff boring I've inserted pictures of funny cats for your entertainment. So... 1.5 Weeks Ago About 1.5 weeks ago, my friend Jon from Living Room gave me the contact info for his uncle. His uncle is an engineer and apparently was looking for new grads and new hands to hire. That week, I gave him a few calls but he wasn't there when I called him and when he returned my calls, I wasn't here either. We were playing phone tag that week *insert schoolgirl giggle*. Sunday Morning So last Sunday morning, his uncle gave me a call at 9 am (The morning! My weakness! HISS!) and we talked about stuff. I was telling him a bit about school as well as elaborating my work/coop experience as he didn't have my resume yet. So he goes on to tell

The Science of God

Not too long ago, two of my friends had posted their thoughts on evolution and creationism. Both friends shared similar sentiments on the topic (you can view Skylar's here and Keith's here ). Coincidence or not, shortly before they made their postings, I purchased a book called The Science of God by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, which was based on the same topic. Unfortunately, at the time of my friend's postings, I had not finished the book, but now I have. In The Science of God , Schroeder attempts to debunk the dichotomy that exists between science/evolution and creationism. He tries to show that there can exist a duality between the two and that discoveries in science actually prove the story of creation in the bible. The book can be roughly divided into three categories that being the concepts of time, the second with the biology of evolution, and lastly the concept of free will. In describing time, he focuses on the 6 days that are explained in the beginning of Genes

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is